Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-28702103-20160609205716/@comment-4560646-20160610230841

Phony Red=No hood wrote: But even if it's not genocide, chara would notice frisk making good relationships with the monsters, which chara hates aswell. http://prntscr.com/bewc2y Wow, such hate over the monsters, amirite? And even if you go with "But NarraChara is only a theory!"(and in which case, see this), please apply logic before blindly stating facts: If Chara "hated monsters", why did they fill the Underground with hope? If Chara "hated monsters", why Asgore continuously told them they were "the future of humans and monsters"? If Chara "hated monsters", why did they live with Asgore, Asriel and Toriel? If Chara "hated monsters", why didn't they kill Asriel on sight and go on a killing spree from the start, which would be a much quicker and efficient way of racking up LV? All it would take is take out Asriel in a sneak attack, absorb his soul, and ta-da, you are now a powerful being and can kill monsters with much more ease.

Chara was never stated to hate monsters. They hated humanity. You're pulling out facts from nowhere, and claiming they're canon. Plus, even if Chara hated monsters, Chara could take control of Frisk from the start as soon as they started befriending everyone. But they never do that. They are content to let Frisk do their thing. Proof is that, if you're doing a Genocide route, but abort it, then Chara stops being vicious, and the game boots back into a Neutral route. If your theory were true, then as soon as you aborted Genocide, then Chara would immediatly attack you or otherwise possess you for "abandoning the mission". But, once again, they never do that. Phony Red=No hood wrote: AND OPEL SPEEDSTER there is no reason to be a hater!!!! Phony Red=No hood wrote: it's just a theroy!!!! I'm not hating on you. I'm providing criticism on your theory. I'm telling you it's wrong, pointing out why, and telling you to do research before affirming something as baseless as this. I get it, you like to post theories, but seriously, do some research and provide evidence to back it up. Theories need evidence - LOTS of it. If you don't have evidence, then it's not a theory - it's a headcanon. It's fine to have a headcanon even if you don't have evidence to back it up, but if you go flaunting it as a theory, or worse, treat it as canon, then you will get criticism and backlash.