Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20181123023529/@comment-32182236-20181124002825

The evidence from the novels you pointed out would be the evidence to debunk the former hypothesis. Since the entire event is ONE springlock failure. Once again, evidence wins. The fact that it doesn't fit the lore evidence is why we debunk this possibility.

My whole point is:We should look at what best fits the evidence. And in your analogy, said possibility ended up being the most likely one anyways.

Now, what does the evidence say about Sans? It says that he's a monster. It says that the Elevator Man is Asriel. It says that Asriel turns back into a flower when we literally get to see the aftermath!

The story potential perspective is therefore completely irrelevant, the evidential perspective does the job well enough. And actually relies on science.