Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-28898329-20160901162911/@comment-33883848-20190828094551

"The theory requires jumps in conclusions based on very little evidence. It cherry-picked lines of narration that have to be interpreted in just the right way to mean anything which makes unbelievably convoluted."

Sorry but what ??little evidences ?!

1.Chara is present in every single run not just genocide (Chara's memories and their name in the interface prove it)

2.Chara can speak in white narration too in genocide run,"My bed", "Our clothes","It's me Chara"is in white text.

3.Pacifist narrator is a person with their own, making a lot and lot of mistakes, ignoring lot and lot of things(i wouldn't quote them,there's a LOT of narrations like that),having their own sarcastic humour and often tease Frisk.Sometimes outright act like a real person" What a nice smell...","Blue prints.. Blue prints wait could it be a clue?No its completely useless", "Ah Whoa Whoa, its a" Hole""

4.Pacifist narrator is NOT Frisk, the narrator always refers to Frisk in second person

5.Despite not being omniscient, the narrator knows that Chara died on their own bed.

6.The narrator is present with Frisk throughout their adventure as they are optimistic if they never killed anyone and pessimistic if they ever did.

7.The narrator has a connection with Dreemurrs, they remove all jokes in the items during their fights and often have this reaction "...."The same as Chara has when you check the family's photo

8.The narrator has a STRONG reaction upon hearing Asriel's voice.

9.The narrator can taste, see,feel whatever Frisk does,implying that they share the same body. And can't be seen, which also endorse that they are inside Frisk.

10.The narrator was not present with Frisk until they fell in the underground.Indeed,they aren't sure whatever or not the golden flowers have broken their fall.

11.The narration is not present at the very start of the game(there's no narration when you check the golden flowers at the very start until you meet Toriel), which coincide Chara's" confused "state of mind at this point.

12.Many neutral run narrations are also present in genocide run while it's clear that Chara is the narrator in this run.

" Like Chara speaks in full stop sentences"

Example ??(besides the end of Genocide run).Plus,your actions definetely affect the narrator(the "The stovetop is very clean,someone must use fire magic instead"becomes "Stovetop",The narration for the wall "the space behind the wall is only a few feet wide"becomes "It's just here to complete the look").Which explains why the narration change in genocide run.

" and first person while the narrator doesn't. "

Wrong.

"Don't slow me down" "I have better to do"-pacifist flee text

"Which if anything shows that Toby indended to them be different (otherwise why give Chara a specific speech pattern)."

Which shows that our actions definetely influence the narrator as otherwise ,why should we have two narrators,especially in the same run??Who else could be the narrator in pacifist neutral run if the only character thats always present with Frisk is Chara?

" For one, Chara wouldn't know what Asriels attacks are. This is a new form and he's never taken it before. Yet this is explained away by saying this is a character he invented as a child, even though there's no indictation he ever did so (plus "god of hyper-death" is specific to this situation)."

How do you know that the "god of hyper death"is specific to this battle??Dont talk like you know Toby Fox personally.Plus ,the "god of hyperdeath "name and attacks names make it sound like it's his OC character that he created as a child

"I'll expand upon this more later."

No need.