Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20181229180615/@comment-35806478-20190130084926

I'm back.

Ferret, you misinterpret the book. You claim monsters must not be able to express darkness, and the book proves this. This is wrong on 3 different accounts.

1. The book only says that monster SOULs have love, hope, and compassion. Monster essences, on the other hand, aren't recognized by the book. Therefore, monster essences could contain darkness.

2. The book is not necessarily correct. The liibrarbies have very unprofessional books; somehow, Monster Kid's essay ended up in Undertale's librarby, and Napstablook's diary ended up in Deltarune's library. Not exactly top-quality material.

3. Finally (and this is my favorite one) '''the book never claims that monster SOULs contain love, hope, and compassion. '''The quotes from the book:

"Love, hope, compassion... This is what people say monster SOULs are made of."

"But the absolute nature of 'SOUL' is unknown."

"After all, humans have proven their SOULs don't need these things to exist."

You see? The book is very vague, basing its statements off of vague rumors grounded in no scientific fact.