Talk:Chara/@comment-37748092-20200123210923/@comment-33170295-20200129184609

@TheHumanAmbassador

"After we realized that with what little power we had left.. We could SAVE something else?"

Realizing that you can SAVE something else was flavor text, meaning it, by your logic, came from Chara. You can't apply/ignore the Narrator!Chara theory (which is apparently canon) whenever it's convienent to you.

"..which Chara conveniently does not help us at all with."

A few moments ago, flavor text didn't come from Chara.

"And as Chara makes explicit instructions not to stray from the path of Genocide.. (Shouldn't proceed yet) Are there times when they explicitly say NOT to kill a particular monster?"

Yes, but they said nothing on the True Pacifist route indicating they wanted to kill/fight anyone. Therefore, your "we judge them for what could've happened" point is invalid.

"..if someone drives recklessly, we still say that's wrong, even if they don't actually crash into someone as a consequence. Because that could have happened."

This point only works if Chara themselves attempted to fight a monster but didn't kill it, which never happens, regardless of what route you're on.