Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190617222636/@comment-33883848-20190729135228

PersonThePerson wrote: ‘"Monsters are not experienced with illness." Doesn't mean that monsters can't become ill.. it means that monsters HAVEN'T been becoming ill.’

???

Did you mean to switch those two phrases? “This line doesn’t mean that monsters haven’t been becoming ill, it means that monsters can’t become ill.”

And anyways, that’s not how I interpret it. I interpret it the other way around, just like what you wrote!

Remember when I talked about the word “Unfortunately” at the beginning of the line? Why did you cut that out? It was the basis for my whole reasoning about which interpretation was correct.

Being experienced with something means you have lots of...well, experience. Therefore, “unfortunately” “not being experienced” with illness means that, unfortunately, monsters do not have lots of experience with illness. And this is bad why? Because monsters still get sick every once in a while.

That’s how I see it, anyway.

I'am like 1000000000000000000% sure that it's a reference to Chara's illness (that's what monsters thought when they get poisoned from buttercups),if monsters truly can get sick then that's rather odd that they are not familar with it.