Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31619784-20170328162322/@comment-28517148-20170330194631

I guess I'll just have to accept that I won't get my nice, "logical" explanation for why the events transpire the way they do. Well, where canon and theories fails, realistic point of view (player's perspective) and facts can be helpfull. You still can get some answers if you use RPOV and simply call things by thair real names. And it works. For example: some people debated about how Frisk is being possessed by player and from where Frisk's determination comes from. In these examples canon may not be very helpful or even can be misleading. However, using RPOV, it can be said that Frisk is the Playable Character - that's logical and that's fact. No theories. With that knowledge answers are easy: as PC, Frisk has no free will nor soul so possesion is impossible in this case. Moreover - Frisk needs to be controlled - they actually requires an external source of control. Also lacking in will Frisk can't make decisions so We must do it for them. We are Frisk's soul, not determination because they already has large quantity of it that allows them to Save and survive impossible to dodge, devastating attacks. The determination that is actually useless without free will - one and only thing capable to tell when and where to use such powerful force. These simple examples shows that almost everything can be solved by this way. And I mean almost only because knowledge derived from some answers may be not very useful. The effort to get answer may be more valuable than answer itself. One more thing: if there is no player, RPOV cannot be properly used because We are one and only thing that links game and reality. But hey, without Players game existence is pointless, so thare is still hope to not to stuck in theories and guesses...