Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20190716014521/@comment-33883848-20190805173422

"We could argue that Chara replaces the true white narrator in the genocide route. There's also the fact that sometimes, the narrator says things that Chara shouldn't be able to know, or things that just aren't very consistent with the idea that they are the one narrating: https://redd.it/7oayat"

As is said,many of the neutral narrations still the same in the genocide run,so no the narrator isnt "replaced"in this run.Either there's two narrators in the same run without any indication who's talking,whatever its the text sound or the color(since Chara speak in white text too "Its me Chara","My bed","our clothes","in my way"etc...are in white text and are clearly said by Chara),either there's only one narrator.

Now let's this guy's "counter arguments"that ive heard like HUNDRED times already(by this same guy),

"it's a coffin,there is a name engraved on it 'Chara'."

They are just stating facts,just because they dont aknowldrge their name as theirs doenst mean anything.

"you called out their name"

The last person to save in the battle is Asriel as the narration say,so the narrator is talking about Asriel whose identity is unknown yet

"name the fallen human" -the narrator refer to Chara as third person/someone else,in naturel/pacifist."

The in game nareator only appears when you meet Flowey and Toriel:they dont say anything about the golden flowers unless you meet Flowey and Toriel

"undyne is thinking about her friends" "papyrus realized that he doesn't have ears"-unless Chara can read minds,it would be impossible for them to have this information."

In the genocide run,Chara know how many monsters are left in each area,even the op mention it as "weird'and as proof that Chara isnt a "normal child",so thats not suprising that they can read minds,or perhaps they guess it by observing the behavior(fun fact,the narrator spend a lot of time observing the monster's behaviour in the narration so that's not suprising that they guess their thoughts,Asriel even indicate that Chara was a highly empatheic person and.Sans too can guess how many times you died by just observing Frisk's expressions so that's not weird at all)

"there are also other things that Chara shouldn't be able to know,yet the narrator does such as: 1-the stats and the effects of all the items. " Unless they lived in the underground

"2-the name of all the almost all the monster."

Unless they lived among monsters and know each one specy.

" -the narrator says thing like "No data" which implies that they are an AI,or part of code of some kind."

I dont remember when that even happen.Also,if the narrator is a person in the geno run,then there's no reason for pacifist/neutral run to just have a game mecanism,plus the pacifist narrator can give their own opinions,isnt all knowing,can make mistakes ,have a sence of humour can say things that an objective narrator would like NEVER say like "Ah wow wow its a HOLE!!","What a nice smell..."(when you chevk Toriel's snail pie in hard mode )

"Chara speaks in complix and overly dramatic deluge,while the narrator speaks normally."

There's no examples so i dont consider this as an atgunebt at all.Chara can speak nodmally too "Our clothes""Ive already read it",My bed"narrations arent complex at all.They only speaks in a "iverly dramatic deluge"at the really end of the genocide run,and even then they still use contractions and short sentences.Plus in japanese version ,they speak very informally.

I only see two important counter arguments for this theory

-When confronting Woshua Frisk tell jokes about Chara,the narrator refers to Chara with third person(but who know perhaps they dont know about who frisk is talking to?)

-When you check Toriel's bed in the epilogue it says "Earlier YOU identified this a a twin sized bed"while it was the narrator who said that its a "twin sized bed"not Frisk,hinting that Frisk may be the narrator

Other than that,there's not so much info that contradicts this idea