Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20170602170443/@comment-32182236-20170727173446

I'm saying the humans' choice in banishing the monsters is justfified. They were not in the wrong, and most certainly do NOT deserve to be eradicated, and neither no the monsters. Why do you think I said the Pacifist variation of the Neutral Ending was the best one, instead of the Near-Genocide, or even FULL Genocide Ending? Because we shouldn't be killing all the monsters. Separating them from humans is a much better solution.