Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-26843781-20160301110343/@comment-28029625-20160427221106

Okay so I'm going to talk a bit about Chara here, because Chara condradicts your theory.

Chara doesn't control Frisk's actions from the beginning. Reason? The kill count goes up. That's Frisk's kill count. Many people want to say that "oh it wasn't Frisk's fault" and say stuff that would make Frisk not take responsibility for their actions, even though they did it. So the kill count goes up.

Until Sans.

Because that last strike was from Chara. The strike happened automatically. Same with Asgore and Flowey. And the kill count didn't go up for those either. Because those were Chara's kills, and they don't go toward Frisk's kills.

-

And then about other stuff:

In context, the "i gave up trying to go back a long time ago" is about the timelines, because it's in the context of the timelines. Sans is talking about timelines resetting left and right, and then says that. It would make sense too; if previous timelines happened, wouldn't you be curious of a way to get back, or to stop the resets?

The "take it from me, someday you gotta learn when to QUIT" isn't about Gaster, it's about his laziness. This is supported by the neutral ending where youve killed everyone youve encountered (not genocide because you dont go out of your way to kill everything). Sans talks about how he isnt fit to be a leader and that either way he likes "to take it easy you know?" He then says "That was a joke. This is what happens when people like me take it easy". He had to quit taking it easy. When everyone before him was dead, that's when he decided to quit taking it easy.

-

(this by the way, is not a criticism of your theory. theories make the world go around. this is just me providing some counter-evidence. but nice job so far!)