Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20200107155350/@comment-32182236-20200120225614

Flowey is actually a very good parallel to the player.

He had the same abilities as us, started off good like us, grew curious like us...

However, I'm not going to say that Flowey IS the player. More like he was... a player. That is definitely not us.

Just like Chara is not us, but someone we sell our SOUL to.

And he calls us Chara because:


 * 1) We both have a red SOUL
 * 2) We act like how Flowey would imagine Chara acting (in the Pacifist Route, he says he was projecting. In the Genocide Route, we team up with Flowey, as if we were friends. Asriel's friend was Chara, and Flowey assumed if he was soulless, Chara would be as well. He was correct.. But he was wrong about Frisk being Chara.

And questionably..

3:Because Chara IS there. (They are the narrator, after all.)

@Jacky:What would this particular hypothesis be under the talk OF? I don't think the Ferret Theory has an article on the Wiki (and I don't think an article of the Ferret Theory belongs on the wiki either-Just as there shouldn't be an article for the Narrator Theory.)

Recall that talk pages are pages that correspond to articles. For example, Talk:Chara is about Chara (Though it's completely blank:Does the Undertale Wiki not use Talk pages? ..It definitely doesn't. The Genocide Route talk page is also empty, and there was definitely discussion as to whether or not to use that name in the early days of the wiki.)

And Discord is basically a chat app. It doesn't have threads. It has channels, each with a distinct topic, yes, but not individual threads:So there'd be a theorist channel, but every Undertale theory would be lumped together in one giant channel. We wouldn't have a place to specifically target the Ferret Theory, let alone my specific rebuttal TO that specific theory!

The Undertale Wiki also doesn't use User Blogs.