Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-35485514-20191011161517/@comment-33883848-20191012165841

Chara was never the vilain in Undertale:Flowey is the main vilain of the game who literally wants to destroy the whole world and Asgore,Toriel,Papyrus,Undyne,Mettaton,Alphys are too in a way as they are obstacles to Frisk and as they are misguided.Chara never even interferes in pacifist/neutral runs(at least not directly but maybe as the narrator)only at the really end of the genocide run or at the very end of the souless pacifist end.So considering that Chara directly interferes only TWICE in the whole game for few seconds2 and never in regular pacifist/neutral runs ,how can they be the villain?.If they were really a vilain as all others,they would have a battle,or if they were the main vilain,we would have to fight Chara and not Asriel in the true pacifist end,that's unlike the 70% of fanworks where Chara is depicted as the main vilain,which is a gross misunderstanding of the game.

Now i hear someone screaming "BUUUUT CHARA IS POSSESING FRISK IN GENOCIDE RUN FORCING THEM TO KILL EVERYONE"while it's true that Frisk behave differently in this run(which might be a result of corruotion rather than Chara's influence),you can still spare all monsters in this run,you can still reset and start another run,you can abort this run,how does that make sence if Chara is really possesing Frisk?Why would Chara take over Frisk to kill everyone and then change their mind and give up their control over them?Why would Chara ask you to take another path in second genocide run if they were the one who do genocide run? I think it's pretty clear that the player/Frisk is still in control during genocide run,you seems to be still roleplaying as Frisk or more precesely,you're controling Frisk and Chara in all runs.

Ps:Whatever or not they are evil is another discussion but they are definetely not the vilain of the game as this role is fulfilled by our beloved flower