Talk:Chara/@comment-35274572-20180525000303/@comment-4015220-20180602184151

I'm the one who's stating facts and ONLY facts, you're the one who's doing the ignoring here, you need to re-read what you typed. Chara will always be evil no matter what route you take, just because you took the True Pacifist route, doesn't make Chara good, it just means that she didn't get what she wanted.

And you're the one who's misunderstanding, if we're going to be technical, then at the end of the route, Flowey wasn't talking to Chara, but us the players. You need to separate fiction and reality. Let me tell you what I see: I see Frisk as a character that I play in the game, and the True Pacifist and Genocide paths are possible routes that Frisk may take and become either, "The angel who breaks the barrier and frees the monsters, or the angel of death who slaughters them all."

Chara is the evil character in the game who's, "the demon who comes when people call its name."

Now let's talk about points of views: There's the player's point of view, where you see yourself as Frisk and Chara, in other words, Frisk and Chara aren't characters in the game, they don't exist, it's just us the players. Then there's the game's point of view, story mode if you will, where both of these characters exist and they are what I stated above about how I see them.

Now if you're looking at them from the player's point of view, then you can't say that Chara isn't good or bad, because there is no Chara and there is no Frisk, it's just you, the player. DON'T mix the two up, otherwise this entire conversation we've been having is pointless.

I thought that you had the same point of view as me, otherwise we wouldn't be having this conversation. But apparently I was wrong.