Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27907368-20160528162922/@comment-28574714-20160604220122

Isthereaplace wrote: It can refer to you betraying her, not the kill itself. Because, as far as I know, if you kill her otherwise, even on genocide, she doesn't believe you will fit in.

She calls you out on agression when others are vulnerable. Does it sound familiar? Who wouldn't be vulnerable after losing a biological and an adopted child? And what did Asgore do? Declare war, before a healthy period of grieving was over. He didn't even allow for a chance to properly bury Chara. Toriel had to take their body, to do it herself.

Then, new children arrived. She treated all of them as they were her own. Then they left, and were hunted on Asgore's order (killed personally by Asgore himself). An order (and an act), he knew was against Toriel's wishes.

So, Toriel thinks that, as a literal backstabber, you will fit into a world ruled by a figurative backstabber. I suppose it could. I still think that Toriel would be too kind to typecast all the monsters based on one though, so maybe thats what perplexes me about "fitting in" out there. I'm sure she's think that her "strike up a conversation' tactic would be enough.

Also, if that's true, what kind of person would that make Toriel? I mean, she's a Boss monster too, so she'd be the only person able to stop Asgore, likely with words, but even if it came to fighting.

Also, she was banging the dude, so I'm sure she knew what kind of person he was. He obviously was acting in a fatherly rage, and only needed someone to talk to him. Instead she just threw up her hands and walked out. She did the same thing when it came to every child (including frisk). The kid says "I want to go home" she refuses at first, but then she throws up her hands, and lets the march out to their deaths.

Hmm...