Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20200107155350/@comment-26006155-20200205172353

TheHumanAmbassador wrote: And that the reason I wanted to debate him publicly was so others could watch and fact-check him, since he didn't seem to think any laws of logic applied to him in our private conversations. I'm all for this. Debating it publicly does allow for people to fact-check. It's nice that we have a third party fact-checking things (Thanks a lot, Jacky.)

However, perhaps you could have found a public place that ALSO doesn't have a character limit. After all, the reason he gave was because of the character limit. Perhaps making the Discord channel public would work? Weirdly enough? The place I suggested we debate, was the #FNAF channel on the Game Theorist Discord.

But that's not happening now, is it?