Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20200107155350/@comment-26006155-20200204152626

A common catchphrase I've seen employeed by Merc, Ambassador, Cutesy and Ocean alike, is the phrase: "No Evidence."

Time and again, they that I have "no evidence" for my theories. Even after I've submitted a mount of evidence.

They keep saying small details don't matter. The child pictures on the walls, don't matter. Because they say so. Even if I can positive-ID several members of the Afton Family in those pictures now, that's still just trying to use my theories as evidence. Which should be ignore. Because it as No Evidence.

It's like a broken record with each of these people in turn.

Cutesy took to it an extreme recently on the FNAF Wiki, by trying discredit even the FNAF newspaper clippings as reliable evidence, despite being some of the most solid information we have about the dates and times of when various things happened. That to Cutesy, debunking my theory was a priority far beyond that of faithfully interpreting the lore.

Ambassador has been doing much the same thing. Even making an entire thread about "How to theorize about Undertale", creating his own set of rules to better faciliating ignoring and underminding the importance of details that were clearly deliberately added into the game by the author.

Ambassador has parotted the "No Evidence" line at my many times before. Consider it a signature move.