Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31536324-20190117214835/@comment-33883848-20190329163132

MysteriousMalice wrote: MagomaevaAmina wrote: Honestly its easier to say that the hud is canon just because the player is and so they need a hud to interact with the world(even the keyboard is canon as its mentonned in the game so we ARE playing a game and Toby said all game mecanisms are supposed to make one with narrative,so idk why the options and keyboard's buttons(that are even mentioned by the froggits ,the narrator,alphys) wouldn't be part of the narrative).We are interacting with Undertale world through a game (the games code might be the world code coded in the game that allow to control the world by changing the code,that is even more likely if we consider Sans's hacker ending message canon as he basically says that you can change their world by editing the code)while there's no hud on the surface,so the player cant interact with the world here.That doesn't make Undertale world simulated,doenst assume lot of things like evolution and blabla ,its the simplest explanation aka Occam razor

Now THIS is Occams Razor.

Well,because this is the only theory that has some games arguments as the fact that characters mention the keybord,sans message in the hacker ending about how we can add endings by editing the games code,the fact that our computers date influence undertale worls date(aka so sorfy fight and river person lines),the hint of the exustence of the player as frisk can disobey us,Flowey dialogue about the "suckers"watching them,alphys belief in the player,the fact that that all dialogues are actually lines as confirmed by the narrator"reading this isnt the best way to waste time"etc...And the fact that all games mechanisms arevsupposed to make sence with the narrative.This theory has many evidences and doesnt has so much assumptions,this is why i believe this is occam's razor