Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27524978-20160210030742/@comment-26242189-20160724042931

Oobooglunk wrote: Yossipossi wrote: Oobooglunk wrote: "Fan theories are fun but I feel embarrassed whenever someone calls attention to something I did when I was 16" -Toby Fox

This statement is, at most, neither here nor there. To gain any answers from it would purely involve speculation. Yea yea, becuase embarrestment is a blah blah speculation term envolving this and that cut around corner

Don't pretend to understand my rhetoric when you so obviously don't, please. It's embarrassing to both of us.

Yossipossi wrote: I don't want to hear cr4p like that. I want you to read that again. FAN THEORIES ARE FUN, BUT I FEEL EMBARRASSED WHENEVER SOMEONE CALL ATTENTION TO SOMETHING I DID WHEN I WAS 16.

Also, we can PROVE he's talking about his Earthbound ROM hack, because soon after he posted:

"I guess I should just accept "bad rom hack with swears" as part of my eternal legacy"

​If you want to know where I got the info, I got it from this wikia.

So, by trying to prove this theory, you're just proving his (Toby's) point.

So embarrassment over something magically makes it vanish from your life? If you were, say, Kim Kardashian and your sex tape were leaked all over the Internet, you might be embarrassed about it but that wouldn't make it go away. In fact, Kim herself does not deny its existence despite being embarrassed about it.

Besides, Toby Fox is known to appreciate other people's interpretation of his work rather than step in and correct a "wrong" opinion on it. If anything, this theory is doing little more than giving his work extra publicity. So, Toby Fox made a sequel to his game secretly, published it, and when somebody found out the "TRUTH" then he says that it's embarressing, and says he just better accept it. So, to sum it up, your saying that Toby Fox made  sequel to a game he is embarressed of creating, then says he better accept that Earthbound ROM hack is part of his legacy.

Not to mention, the mountainload of plotholes in the theory. Why were the bones not destroyed? Why did Ness adopt his enemy as a brother? Why does the enemy go along with this? How come Papyrus turns to dust, but Starmen dont? Not to mention Sans' dialogue involing making the costume recently. Why does Asriel eg the power of 7 SOULs and not 8? Why don't we see Sans' SOUL at the TP ending if he's human? How can Sans use magic attacks if hes human? How come the machine is shaped in a different way then the phase distorter? How can Frisk depict Sans as Ness if they look NOTHING alike. Why do fans instantly assume the badge is from Earthbound??

And why, WHY, is Toby Fox embarressed about a game he "made a sequel" to? If he really intended for it to be a sequel, WHY DOES HE REGRET MAKING THE FIRST!?

The logic in this theory is flawed, and the only reason I can see you defending it is because you're one of those "MATPAT IS RIGHT, NOT QUESTION ABOUT IT" fans. The amount of anti-evidence for the theory, the way aToby Fox feels about it, ALL OF THESE FACTORS, and still, still, you argue saying he's right.

I just cannot understand you.

So you know what? No. I'm not going to argue with you. You can go and say "yay i won" but I'm saying it here: You're not going to accept a word I say towards you, and every proof I bring, even if it PROVES Matpat dun goofed with this theory, YOU WILL NOT ACCEPT IT. You're going to say something about how "This word's TECHNICAL meaning is slightly different from this, meaning this and that." I know how it works.

I've unfollowed the thread by now, so don't bother to respond.

I'm out.