Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26139703-20160516232505

The player is. Chara does not force the player to kill anytime. They can stop killing whenever they want to (except in the end), but it's their choice almost the whole way. If Chara were possesing Frisk, a second Genocide would not be an option. On the end of the second one, she (Chara's a female name, so i'm calling them she/her) suggests to try a different route (which would be True Pacifist, since that if it is done, she will destroy humanity). In this case, the player would be forced to do True Pacifist. She also says she "there is a reason YOU continue to destroy this world." and she says she can't understand those feelings. She also says "you wnat to go back to the world YOU destroyed" "YOU were the one who pushed everything to it's edge" after the genocide.

If the player were Chara controlling Frisk, Chara is only bad if the player makes her bad.  