Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20190716003715/@comment-32182236-20190823203903

1-"Frisk is the one making the options". Elaborate?

Frisk is the one choosing what to do. I suppose I should have just said choices to be clearer.

Chara doesn't make Frisk do Genocide. Or Pacifist. They don't choose anything for Frisk. Frisk is the one using the HUD to choose what to do, so this is evidence that the HUD is attuned to Frisk.

2-Dog food. Generally blunt in Genocide: "Stovetop" "In my way"

Did you look at the second part of my question? "Rather than being corrupted from the start?"

Proving that they're corrupted in Genocide is easy. I'm asking you to show evidence that they're not also corrupted in Pacifist. As it's simpler to say that they're just already that way than to say that WE'RE responsible for it.

3-Hurting does not accrue EXP, just killing. Why? Because you can hurt someone without leaving a mark on the soul (lowercase). But causing the enemy to cease existence is much different. Chara never reached that point, only wanted to. It's also possible that the LOVE reset on death. "At first, I was so confused."

I suppose I should have elaborated here as well.

I meant that they were ALREADY willing to do that. So their LV was already above 1, even before this incident. The incident didn't bump up their LV, because it was already high enough to do that.

And they wanted to kill six humans before then. If they had no LV, why would they want to do that? Calling out their name... Interesting idea. I'll think about it.

Alright, then. We'll see what you come up with. I'm just pointing out what Chara said, and the name selection. I'm much better at debunking theories (or at least demoting them from theories to speculation) than making them. Mainly because I look for ways that the theories either contradict each other, or blatantly break the rules of theorization that I establish here.. Meaning they're not theories. In the latter case, they might still be true.. But as skeptics, we shouldn't believe a claim without evidence.

Chara might be too lazy or stubborn to switch to the correct name.

I wonder if we could make a character analysis of Chara. That way, we can test the validity of both this claim and #2 at the same time.

But an actual analysis this time. Rather than speculation.