Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20190716014521/@comment-32182236-20190805212110

Tsskyx wrote: The issue with most of your premises about the narrator is that their validity is very subjective. There isn't any actual proof in the game that Chara is the narrator. There's just the indirect evidence. In this case, most of the premises have been established as "true" purely based on probability. The probability of this actually being Toby's intention, or perhaps the probability from an in-game perspective. I was using the Narrator theory as an example. Back in Part 1, I mentioned the premises must all be true.

Yes, if the premises are wrong, then the argument is not sound. Because there has been a factual error.