Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28170964-20160412202919/@comment-26814804-20160612043250

Rbally wrote: Circumstancial? Like how its circumstance that the sky is blue or this evidence shaped piece of information? Which are you defining as circumstantial. Google is your friend, just do your research. No. I mean circumstancial, as in it doesn't actually mean anything.

1: Shyren's lower body is tone-deaf, the brains behind Shyren's music career, and able to sing a deadly song. Huh? What does that mean? That's just some random fact. That has nothing to do with Gaster, Sans, or Papyurus.

2: Huh? No. That doesn't explain ''anything. You're literally claiming that that sentence, which is completely irrelevant, explains everything.''

3: You mean, "Ghast?" Not Gast. Big difference. And "similar but unalike?" Similar but not similar? Alike, but unalike? That doesn't make any sense. Also, Sans and Papyrus are not similar to Gaster, as far as we can see.

3: Yes. But that doesn't have anything to do with Gaster.

4: Indeed. What does that have to do with Sans or Papyrus?

5: Huh? What does that have to do with ANYTHING?

6: ... this one is gonna need two parts. First off, "who came first, Papyrus or Sans?" Uh, Sans. Toby Fox confirmed that Papyrus is Sans' younger brother. And besides, what does that have to do with Gaster? I don't freaking get it!!!

Ok, next... "Clearly the products of W.D. gasters mysterious experiments." WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? How is that clear? They're just skeletons, monsters like any other monster. Seriously, what makes you think they had to have been spawned by some "mysterious experiments?" What makes that so "clear?"

Listen. I'm sorry for being so salty, but you're not making any sense, making fun of my argument, and then refusing to actually back up your point, instead just pointing me to google. You can't just do that.