Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190403163405/@comment-33745727-20190425145617

Scott released the game early because I sent him this theory video the day before the release, where I figured out almost every plot detail except Shadow Bonnie:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq_5QeCasA8

"The Color Brothers" - The FInal Theory Episode 2

Scott did NOT say nothing in the game is canon, his annoucement specificly said BOTH the book AND the games were canon. But trying to literaly write the story of the minimalist games into a satisfying book would be impossible, so he took all the events that happened in the games, reshuffled them, and redealt all the storyboard cards while adding new characters in, to make a parralell world where he could tell a good story AND clarify the events of the games.

Scott has NEVER said "The Silver Eyes" was non-cannon.

(click)

If "It was known" that William Afton was the killer.. why did Henry, his long-time partern, let him stay on via alias as his partner in Fazbear's Pizza as well?"

Knowing, as he must have known.. that Willian "Dave" Afton killed Henry's own son Sammy?

The murders were perpetrated by stuffing children into springsuits. Who designed the springsuits? Henry.

Why is FREDBEAR the one that kidnaps Michael, who we later learn was murdered, and became Golden Freddy?

Why do we see Dave and Henry and Dave and Henry and Spring Fredbear and Spring Bonnie and Fredbear and Springtrap OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER again, with Charlie herself finally realizing that Dad was involved?

Dad's the one who INVENTED stuffing, the process by which a human soul is bound to a robot. William Afton's fanboyish notes confirm this, he was just helping Henry make animatronics the whole time.

Putting human souls into robots is WHAT FIVE NIGHTS AT FREDDY'S IS ALL ABOUT! Under the pretty costumes, it's all been about the robots! Robots with human personality. Because they USED TO BE PEOPLE! This is not some dimestore horror slasher novel, this is a handcrafted genius of a mystery involving a classic tenant of science fiction!

(click)

Hi folks, just a few notes, since my head is swimming trying to keep up with all this :)

I do believe FNAF is a grand work of art, a devious right-brained hand-crafted artistic puzzle the likes of which have rarely been seen, except by games like Undertale. The hardest part of the mystery of FNAF is that it DOESN'T GIVE YOU THE QUESTIONS, you have to come up with those first and pick the right ones if you want to get anywhere.

Why did Purple Guy come back in FNAF 3? "He always does" That's not an answer! "Fredbear order him to come back and help him get revenge on the children who stuffed him, Phone Guy, into the Fredbear suit, and he had to choose between fighting 4 kids, or Fredbear, wisely taking his odds with the kids." Now THAT'S more of an answer :)

Why are the kids being killed? Nobody seems to ask this one.. just assuming some homicial maniac is behind it like any other horror movie. Nevermind that stuffing someone into an animatronic is physically impossible unless you have either The Star Wars Garbage Masher or suits (like the springsuits) designed to be capable of crushing someone inside them. The springsuits are marvels of technology that serve no obvious purpose besides being INCREDIBLY DANGEROUS. We're dealing with someone who can not only design a DARPA-level transformaing robot suit, but someone who has organizes and run several Fazbear Entertainment restaurants back to back with several-year intervals between them. This guy hias more DETERMINATION than Frisk from Undertale.. someone with such talent would not be wasting it on pointlessly killing kids! Unless he was getting someone so valuable out of that he thought the massive risk was worth the reward..

Scott is all about robots, he has a broken-down robot in every game. The Desolate Hope BEGINS with the consciousness of a small program getting loaded into another robot's body, then goes Matrix-virtual world-crazy from there. FNAF is not about the colorful costumes, as much character as they add to the characters.. it's about THE ROBOTS! Robots with human souls trapped inside them, as the animatronics are bursting with personality and a purpose that defies the behavior of any curd 1980's AI.

With the ability to put human minds in robots.. Phone Guy could redefinte the future in a way Bill Gates and Steve Jobs never could.. inventing IMMORTALITY for the first time, and putting himself in a position of power where he could do whatever he liked.. guide humanity to some bright future.. or enslave everyone and take over the world! Faced with writing the future of all mankind.. WHY NOT kill a few kids as test subjects to learn how to perfect the process?

This is the story of FNAF. A mad scientist living at the start of the home computer revolution is perfecting robotic consciousness transfer, using children and extra security guards as guinea pigs. And the only one who can stop him are a bunch of childen who are ALREADY DEAD!

This is the story of the Games, at least, Phone Guy the Psychopath is out mad inventor. Henry from the books is a much more complex character, he really loves his children, and his wife, and his relationship with his inner persona Fredbear is more a Dr Jeklly and Mr. Hyde situation: Henry is good, but Fredbear is just as evil as Springtrap.

I did miss that Charlie from the book actually IS in FNAF 4, as the girl in the hidden park surrounded by the miniature Toy Animatronics. Someone in comments told me about this, I checked it, and her shirt isn't only Purple, it's MAGENTA, the true color of The Pink Guy. This really is Phone Guy's daughter. What that means, for her being the Matrix of FNAF 4, I don't know yet. We're probably going to need another book. I did make an annotation correcting the error though. It's always best to watch my video on a computer, since I use A TON OF CLICKABLE ANNOTATIONS.

I know the title of the show sounds bold, but I've made mistakes every singel episode of The Final Theory. I'm actually pretty embarrased by the first episode simply title "The Final Theory" now, while the main goal, establishing Jeremy as the Bite of '87 victim, was right on, and I've kept to that all the way through FNAF 4 and even FNAF World, I still believe there was only one villian, and that Golden Freddy and Fredbear were the same creature. Switching both of these mistakes was the main driving force behind "The Color Brothers", my biggest and best video so far, which establishes all the reasons why there are two villains, and EXACTLY why they are killing children, something nobody else has truly answered before.

I don't know why MatPat has actively discouraged talk about The Two Villain theory on both the 2nd and 3rd megastreams, shutting up some of his own guests when they brought up the subject. I do know that it's dangerous to let any one person control what theories are considered 'acceptable' by the Community at large, especially when they might use this power to steal the credit from an artist for the genius of his work. I want people to learn the amazing story behind FNAF, that's what keeps me going.

(click)

"Ocean Ocean", a theorist I met in Youtube comments that's been following my work very closely, and trolling it whenever possible.

Most of his comments were distracting, but he showed an uncharacteristic level of attentiveness and brilliance when I mentioned to someone completely different that I left Jeremy's corresponding character in "The Silver Eyes" out of the video. Ocean Ocean correctly identified that I was talking about Officer Dunn, the only person Purple Guy/Springtrap actually kills during the book, using a silver knife similiar to the one Henry uses. Springtrap said "your father loved, and now I have loved." He must have put Officer Dunn's soul into an animatronic, someone we're likely to see in the next book who will approximately follow Jeremy's journey from the games.

So clearly, "Ocean Ocean" was a theorist, and one of some talent.

He didn't reveal much about himself during out talk, although I revealed a great many things about myself, but I was able to gather a few things. He was a champion of the 'multiple springlock failures on a single suit' school of thought, I could never seem to convince him of the purpose of the springsuits in the story, or that Phone Guy is referring to the murder of the original 5 children in this statement. He also was deadset on the person in the Spring Bonnie suit being an employee. It didn't matter than I pointed out that these interpretations took the story nowhere, while the alternatives opened up incredible story opportunities. And that an artist who's putting his name and reputation on the line by releasing a game would definitely shoot for a better story rather than crashing it into the ground.

The most curious thing, though, was that he kept telling me, over and over and over and over again, that I should stop making videos. That there "would be blood" if the story of FNAF came out. He would never give another reason why he thought it was such a bad idea, but only insisted that it was

Now, I've gotten lots of different reactions from people on my videos over the last few months. Some people absolutely loved them, thanked me for giving them the keys to understanding "The Silver Eyes" novel, and couldn't wait for me to actually finish "Jeremy's Last Sight". Some people were theorists themselves and spared with me, questioning my conclusions, and sometimes they pointed out something I'd missed, like Charlie, the main character from "The Silver Eyes" actually being the girl in the central park in FNAF 4, surrounded by the shrunken Toy Animatronics. Some people thought my videos were utter shit, and couldn't care less how I wasted my time making them.

But there was only one commenter who ever actually told me that making more videos was a bad idea, and actively told me to stop. And his name was "Ocean Ocean". And inspite of whatever he said, he watched my videos like a hawk, jumping into conversations he wasn't even included in to snap at any new piece of information I might be dropping. He was clearly keenly interested in what I was doing, even if he didn't like it one bit. Almost as if he thought he had something to lose.

So with Mr. Ocean, we're dealing with a theorist who specializes in FNAF lore, champions multiple springlock failures on a single suit, believes Spring Bonnie contained an employee during the Purple Guy easter egg, and believes he has something personally to lose should my videos, and the Two Villain theory, ever become accepted.

Does that answer your question, Mr. Matthew Patrick?

(click)

It's weird.

You'd think there would be a major difference in ideas due to the evolution of the story, but honestly it's hardly changed.

Anyways, we're nearing the post limit, so we better make these last posts count, guys.