Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20190716014521/@comment-27136653-20190805164527

We could argue that Chara replaces the true white narrator in the genocide route. There's also the fact that sometimes, the narrator says things that Chara shouldn't be able to know, or things that just aren't very consistent with the idea that they are the one narrating: https://redd.it/7oayat

Most of those points are bogus, but some are really good. If we wanna be pedantic (like TheHumanAmbassador usually is) and say that even the tiniest contradiction matters and that we must take everything at a face value, then this post alone completely disproves this theory.

On the other hand, if we wanna cut ourselves some slack, then let's ackowledge that coming up with novel explanations when our theories don't work is an okay thing to do. It's not how you'd normally do the scientific method, for example, when an experiment proves that the Earth is round, you accept it, you don't make up some bogus idea like "the astral winds have tampered with the results" or some shit to reaffirm your theory. But this is okay to do for Undertale, since we cannot test our theories, we can only compare them based on their subjective probability. And in that regard, the narrator Chara theory is VERY probable.