Talk:Sans/@comment-27044455-20151129205713

I was thinking... Both in Pacifistic and Neutral Routes Sans tells you that, if he hasn't made that promise to Toriel, Frisk will be dead where they stand. That could makes sense in a Neutral Route where we've already killed someone, but in the Pacifistic Route...? This doesn't make any sense.

I think that, however, it could be a explanation to this.

In Genocide Route, he states that the timeline has "jumping left and right, stopping and starting... until suddenly, everything ends", and accused Frisk for this (which is true). That could mean that he not only is aware about timeline jumps that we have done so fat, but also our futures jumps, and that at least one of those timelines ended in nothing (the destruction of the world). And since timelines are continuously messed up, this timeline is always available. And since Frisk is the origin of this hazard, the simpliest way to deal with it is killing Frisk. But his promise forced him to stay appart until is impossible for Frisk to leave the Genocide Route.

And the warning in the restaurant... well, maybe is a way of blow of steam, because he feel impotent at the whole thing.

What do you think about this? (And sorry for my bad English).