Talk:Chara/@comment-35030974-20191227014300/@comment-32182236-20191230131851

"They either had a physichal body to attack, themselves, or they didn't, and it wasn't them. They can't just be halfway."

They're technically a phantom at this point. A ghostly entity that can still interact with the phsyical world.

"I don't know what's so hard to understand. If it hasn't been confirmed, then it can't be used as evidence. That's why I'm making the argument that Chara didn't kill Sans, Agore, or Flowey. I'm not trying to disprove your theory."

It technically wasn't even confirmed that Flowey is Asriel! We could easily say that after Flowey turned into "his true form", Asriel showed up when the screen was white, and the Asriel we fight is not the same as the Flowey we see. And the flower Asriel said he'd turn into need not necessarily be Flowey.

If you're looking for evidence, check out what I said. Confirmation? Basically nothing's actually confirmed. It's not even confirmed that Asriel died (Sure, monsters said he did, but..)

If a single character stating something is somehow enough to confirm something, but piles of evidence and process of elimination isn't (even though testimony/anecdotal evidence is actually one of the least reliable evidence), then take a look at "It's me, Chara", from the narrator. Looks like the narrator themselves say that they're Chara.

"Then why does Flowey ask you directly to "let Frisk go, let Frisk live their life"?"

What did you just say earlier?

"If it hasn't been confirmed, then it can't be used as evidence."

Flowey was probably talking to CHARA, not the player. I mean, Chara's name is literally the name he used!

"Like I said, if Frisk and Chara have seperate kill counters, than Frisk and the Player must have seperate kill counters as well."

Under the assumption that Frisk and the Player aren't simply synonymous, that is.

"Assuming this is the case, it would point to Frisk doing the damage, not Chara or the Player."

You know what they say about assumptions, right? Occam's Razor tells us to use as few as possible.

Besides, we HAVE to say that someone else killed Sans. The kill counter doesn't go up, so whoever's counter that was, couldn't have killed Sans.

"Which could just as easily be them giving you a chance to abort the Genocide route and be the hero again. Especially considering this line, "You made your choice long ago."

They're basically telling you NOT to abort the Genocide Route. In what world is that NOT steering you towards continuing it?

"And he gets hit with a slash attack even when you press the fight button yourself. You're not really making a point there."

Did you even watch the video? The only times we see a slash are the final two. All attacks prior actually use the correct animation.