Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20190716014521/@comment-27136653-20190805231639

"As is said,many of the neutral run narrations still the same in the genocide run,so no the narrator isnt "replaced"in this run."

Tehnically speaking, no. In the pacifist run or wherever, the narrator says "it's you". In other words, you can make the argument that something within Frisk has been replaced and Chara was put in that place in the genocide run and vice versa.

"In the genocide run,Chara know how many monsters are left in each area,even the op mention it as "weird'and as proof that Chara isnt a "normal child",so thats not suprising that they can read minds too,or perhaps they guess it by observing their behavior"

You are describing the omniscient narrator. There's no proof included that it's Chara. Just that the narrator can read minds. Also, where did you even get it that empathy = mind reading?

"can say things that an objective narrator would NEVER say"

Omniscient narrator =/= objective narrator.

"There's no examples so i dont consider this as an argument at all."

I think they were referring to the red text.

"Plus in japanese version ,they speak very informally so yeah that's irrelevant."

That's not true, they speak very highly, use lots of complex words and kanji, and so on. They may not speak politely, but they certainly aren't laid back.

"Though they can incorrectly describe some items as the monster candy"

This could be a part of the narration troll that makes it subjective.

That's all I'm going to respond to, since as I said, most of the points are bogus.