Talk:Chara/@comment-35030974-20191029225843/@comment-35030974-20191115024025

@Halibee

Let me debunk something that I see way too often in the Chara debates.

"Chara took over Frisk's body in the end."

No. Look at the human's sprite. Do you see a smile and rosy cheeks? No. Do you see a green shirt with a cream stripe on it? No.

Do you see the same human that you play as on the neutral and pacifist route? Yes.

I know that you see Chara's sprite at the end of the Genocide route, and you might take that as evidence that Chara takes control of Frisk at the end (if they hadn't, you'd have seen Frisk's sprite), but that's not the case, because Frisk isn't a human that you take control of and guide through the Underground. You are Frisk. You are the protagonist. You talk to Chara through Frisk's eyes.

In my point, I didn't mean to say Frisk would willingly bring Chara back to life. When I said "Genocide is the only way the human can gain enough power to ressurect Chara," I meant that it's the only way that it's possible for Chara to be ressurected. When Flowey took the SOULs, the humans and monsters weren't trying to ressurect Asriel. They didn't even know it was possible, and that's what I meant. Frisk didn't know that what they were doing would ressurect Chara. And might I bring up another point of yours.

"In other words, Chara wasn't brought back because of anything Frisk did, but rather she absorbed Frisk's power."

Would you mind clarifying? Because Frisk wouldn't have power for Chara to absorb if they hadn't done something to get that power (i.e killing the monsters).

"I was so confused. Our plan had failed, hadn't it? Why was I brought back to life?"

Chara couldn't have ressurected themselves on purpose. They didn't even know what had happened to them. And they couldn't have taken control of Frisk's body because they were only brought back to life after everyone had died.