Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-26257759-20160227232511/@comment-26257759-20160228211529

Mabian wrote: I agree that the details are important, though I'm resistant to the idea that Toby worked on every little detail with such finesse that everything we find or notice has a significance behind it. Toby's definitely a good designer, but he has certainly made mistakes and perhaps even created a hole or two within the game's narrative structure. Which does not mean that all theorizing and attention to detail is meaningless, since some details are absolutely significant. But it means that in performing interpretation it is necessary to tread carefully, as some details may simply exist as allusions to outside works, or have been put in by mistake, or may signify something different than the theory we concoct in our head. So creating theories is definitely worthwhile, but it's also a troublesome proposition since there are so many ways to go wrong, and one wrong step can have long-lasting consequences.

Anyway, so much for all that. Don't let my pontificating discourage you.

Thanks for the oppinion :D The thing is I really love Sans a lot as concept and character and I wold liek to see if other people can put the puzzle a tad together to make it seam real, it might be only theory much of it but many shows and games end up having a fan there being right :D and I really wish to understand more *u* and only details can show that uwu even if some as you said might be just accidentaly there or not even there. But if I could bet on a character NOT having anything put there by accident that wold be Sans, after all he even tells you if you hack the game.