Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190403163405/@comment-33745727-20190415163902

Okay, here it is.

This comment on Reddit, which you never responded to, basically sums up my every issue.

Please read it this time around.

Contradictions aren’t the problem. To an outsider, your lore seems like it has no internal logic, but I’m aware that, to you, it makes sense and fits. The problem is proof. Just because you can’t disprove something doesn’t make it right. I can’t necessarily disprove that all dark skinned characters in FNaF are the same person and an unmentioned Afton, I can’t disprove that the Cupcake contains part of the soul of Henry’s unmentioned wife, nor can I disprove that the FNaF1 restaurant was used as a Fredbear’s (though I find it unlikely given that Pirate Cove for Foxy looks to have been specifically built into the building). However, I and many others don’t see the proof you bring up as being notable. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, evidence which you just don’t have. Especially whenever Scott claimed we figured out most of FNaF 1, 2, and 3 yet your theories are pretty much dependent on the assumption we don’t know jack about the inner workings of them. Not to mention Scott using Mr. Hippo as a way to tell us not to look too deep into things, which you seem to do. Your story is interesting and has an internal logic, don’t get me wrong, I just don’t think it’s substantial enough to be an actual alternative theory to the more mainstream views.