Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24100805-20160201152915/@comment-32025577-20181018085331

Rafip wrote: But if it bothers you that much, then fine, they have no understanding of love at all. That doesn't bother me. I also know that child has no understanding of love, it feels only attachment for parents, friends, pets or toys, but that is not what I am asking for. You do understand the question I have asked several times, don't you? If answering is somehow too difficult or inconvenient or you just don't wish to do it, then say it. Silence will be as good as actual answer from anyone of you, until I start guessing it. Perhaps they don’t understand sexual attraction, but at the least, it’s possible for them to have an understanding of how romance works on a basic level. Romance is inseparable part of sexual attraction, it emerges from it and I already explained why it is not possible for child to neither understand nor have any of those. Also, romance doesn't have "levels". You can only do it right or totally wrong, but children do not romance. ''Because shipping reasons. It’s inevitable in every fandom.'' Yes, I have heard about such activity amongst the fandom and I assure you it is evitable. You only have to have the will to not to do it, it's that simple. Anyway, you have said an interesting thing: shipping as actual reason for making children a non-binary hetero/homosexuals, is that correct? Also, do you people approve "shipping" children? Is "shipping" the reason you would to call Chara and Frisk a non-binary hetero/homosexuals? Is there another reason for that Mr. Freddy Fanatic, Athenian200, MagomaevaAmina, RainTheFan-Person, PublicMinority87? I never said anything about shipping. I believe that Frisk and Chara are both non-binary. That’s what this thread is all about, the gender of Frisk and Chara. Someone else was talking about sexuality, so I made a point on that, and the age of Chara and Frisk. It would be nice if you could not make assumptions please.