Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-32182236-20171014133324

Indeed, we can't bend facts. ACTUAL facts. Also, I see no mistake in comparing it to relativity. We need to analyze the world of Undertale the same way we would analyze this world.

Let's take the HUD, for example. The evidence supports it being real-Sans uses it, so it must exist. There's one of those roadblocks. Since we can't extend our non-HUD theories past it, all that remains is that there is a HUD. Yes, it seems wacky. But we just proved there had to be one because of Sans, just like we proved superposition exists because of the double-slit electron experiment. (Yes, QM is a VERY wacky theory. But that's where looking at all the evidence takes you.) There's either a HUD or there isn't. And if it can't not exist, then it exists. Duh.

Though, during this, conversation, I did learn of a certain possibility that I haven't thought of-It seems I too was making assumptions. Perhaps the world of Undertale is canonically code... The evidence I gave that it isn't only proves that A-Sans can't know it's code, and B-The world of Undertale is not the game the dog mode INSIDE the world of Undertale. Bring up the game box all you want-The logos aren't an exact match like it would be if it was actually Undertale, so really, that's just further evidence the game is question is not Undertale. We can't bend facts, indeed, but we cannot make them up either, turning similarities between symbols into "They MUST be connected!" We must take the evidence for what it explicitly shows. Anything beyond that is speculation that can be questioned, altered:Because it's NOT a fact.