Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28885320-20160711182624/@comment-27089028-20160913154920

Deep-Fried Derp of Illuminati wrote: Starscream1998 wrote:

Deep-Fried Derp of Illuminati wrote:

Starscream1998 wrote:

Deep-Fried Derp of Illuminati wrote: Whatever happened to using CANON information? You do realise 'Canon' info is so limited and brief speculation is unavoidable. You do realize canon resources can be backed up with multiple sources of proof? Proof's a funny thing see, more often or not so called 'proof' ends up being as subjective as speculation. And besides I still don't understand why you feel the need to bring up the issue of canonicity here, elaborate please. Sir, at least give me a good layout of why you feel the need to be hostile. Hostile, perhaps you are misreading something here or maybe it's just the common miscommunication when using just words but I assure you I'm as far from hostile as I can get. Now as I was saying elaborate further on why canonicity is an issue here.