Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-27136653-20171025140824

The credits of that video were a joke. So once again, that makes them meaningless for our analysis.

"Toby did NOT make a fully playable, standalone game. If we take out everything Toby didn't do, Undertale wouldn't be a full game."

FOR THE FIFTH TIME, MORON, the line mentions that Toby programmed (eg. worked on) what will become a full game. It's not claiming that he made it all by himself.

(This is of course assuming that the dog is Toby. So if you feel like it, replace the word "Toby" with the word "dog", so that you don't obviously state to me that it was the dog we're talking about, not Toby. Which I know.)

So no, Toby didn't make a "fraction" of a game. He made a full game, since Undertale IS a full game. It's just that he didn't work on the entirety of it. Just because he didn't work on the whole game doesn't mean he didn't work on A whole game. Are ya getting it already?

I know the english language well, so don't say that these two expressions have the same meaning. Because they fucking do not. I'm not arguing with you over the meaning of english expressions. I'm just stating them as a fact. It is your choice to accept them or not, and it is my choice to call you a moron or not.

And once again, you're having the wrong idea with the analogy (refer to what I wrote above).