Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-27136653-20171024120205

It was an award for Toby Fox according to my knowledge. And since he was getting a real-life award, it couldn't have been the nose nuzzling trophy. Besides, I think Toby was just being lazy, instead of making a new sprite, he used the one that was already in the game. It doesn't imply that it was the nose nuzzling trophy, due to the context.

And dismissing the room is not dismissing any important facts. I said that, since it's the only way to make the story consistent. After all, what facts do we receive when we decide to leave the room in? The fact that the room isn't canon, that's what.

And I am pretty sure that if the dog is referencing Toby, then that line was referencing Undertale, not some other game. Since as I said, Toby made no other "whole" game.

And I'm sorry, but I'll have to call you an idiot. I told you at least twice that the sentence contains an "a", not a "the". The following phrase - "he made the whole thing" does imply that someone made some entire thing all by themselves, but the following one: "he made a whole thing" does not. All such phrase is saying is that someone did a whole thing, not just a small fraction of a thing. Such phrase doesn't even imply whether this person was the only contributor or not.

If there were more contributors, they would all get credit, and it would hold true that ALL of them made A whole game (so saying about one of them that he made A whole game is technically still true), but NONE of them can claim that they did THE whole game (since saying so won't be true, as none of them did THE whole game all by themselves).

I hope you understand my analogy.