Thread:BlackfootFerret/@comment-39932144-20190807134314/@comment-39932144-20190809090700

No I didn't see what happened with SU. I didn't exist then. Stop assuming I did. And from what you're saying, it's basically the same deal as with all the others because you end up losing yourself to the story and forget the few solid rules. There's a reason we get mad, because your narrative started okay, but as time went on it turned to slurry because you held on to your own narrow minded views instead of looking at it freshly. Matpat got to where he is today because he looked at things freshly. I can barely see a resemblance to your theory besides androids and the name Henry. Even then it's different. The reason this is more believable is because it doesn't go OTT and look at everything, which is what you've done for years.

Praise FNaF? Bitch, you've mangled it to the point of biological breakdown. There's a reason so many people oppose you, and that's not because we hate the theory, it's because the theory is too crazy to be true. You simply don't have enough evidence to back up your claims, no matter how many pages you make. Sorry, but 1-3 was solved by the community already. You can say what you want about that, but you are not the whole community, otherwise your thoughts would be everywhere instead of being the thing we try and sweep under the rug. And don't use your fans either. None of them have come to much.

Oh, good for you! You made a wacky prediction. Too bad you used the wrong evidence, because I'm afraid that can't be taken seriously. Even more when you consider Scott didn't plan a FNaF 4 by the second game and was gonna end it at three.

You're pretty fucking full of yourself when it's one person you're talking to.

Sorry, but your still a Mr Nobody if you predict something without the correct evidence. Also give me a break, it barely resembles whatever you pulled out your ass regarding Henry and androids.

Can't see your eye, and maybe I don't want to because I've got a damn good idea of what I'm gonna see.

A man angry at the world because he believes he's right, and everyone is persecuting him for this. The most dangerous assumption in the whole world, which has led to countless atrocities.

My issue is not you being here, it's you holding on to one single idea for years on end, without making significant changes. I'm sorry, but at this point you're lying to keep this going. You still deny Scraptrap is William Afton, despite the fact we've shown you repeatedly he is.

Well, that's a fucking lie if I heard one. What about the minigames? What about the Easter eggs? What about the Logbook? What about actually following the story without getting distracted by all the pretty details that likely mean nothing due to them just being exaggerated kids' drawings? I don't know what you think of kids, but they don't usually do super deep detail on drawings. They're there for aesthetics, not to piece together some ridiculously long story that really doesn't look that impressive when you do if your way. It just looks... Sad. Because if you honestly think you're getting closer to the truth with that, then all I can say is good luck kid, because it'll come back to bite you in the ass later.

Yeah, isn't that just a tad suggestive that maybe it isn't safe for you to do this? I'm sorry, but I don't know anyone who reacts to the story like you do. It's most unhealthy, and a tad disturbing.

Not anymore. Originally I had some idea, but somewhere down the line you lost your rationality as well as your coherrency in terms of storytelling.

Whatever, you're not answering my question again, so I guess you can't. Not really surprising, but I hoped there was something in that hollow shell.

Oh, forgot to answer a previous question.

Yes, I do think you are capable of horrible things. There's very much a bitter edge to you, which tends to show itself when talking about family or other theorists. Although I'm sure that bad stuff happened to you, I don't get why you're holding on to it. I've seen you call your sister EVIL, regardless of the context. Sorry, but isn't this the same sister so autistic she had barely any control over her actions? People say autistic people are just as intelligent as others, and while that's true for most of them, how can you say that for the ones so lost in their fantasy world they don't learn anything? The ones that can barely speak, and punch you while screaming for the slightest thing. Obviously it can't really apply there, so they require more care for their complex needs.

And don't think you're free from this either. You're on a whole different edge of the spectrum, where instead of being overly distracted, you're overly focused. Sorry, but that's not too good for a theorist, because if you analyse things to the point where two lines blur into one, we got a problem. A problem I've seen occur over and over again.

Oh, and another thing. For whatever reason, up there seems to be a general lack of empathy for a lot of people like you. I don't know why, but God does it make them obstinate and arrogant.