Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190403163405/@comment-32182236-20190418220534

Starbomb155 wrote: why o you think this will be thread will be dealted little Hmm, let's see:We have a copypasta taking up nearly half the page, and we have someone who, while rightfully saying Ferret's theories have flaws, makes Ferret out to be far, far worse than he actually is. I'd actually say I'm closer to Ferret than I am to him. And it's not a close call, either. Not by a long shot.

By the way, Akeem Lawanson is not a creator of Steven Universe. He never went against the author. He's saying that MATPAT is going against the author.. Though really, one could interpret his words as saying that Scott's intentionally hiding the pieces so that we'd keep on looking.. So he can reveal more game, after game, after game.

But eventually, he's going to run out of new story material. The franchise is going to have to come to a close. There's been a lot of fake-outs when it comes to closing the franchise, but there will be a real one. Then, the pieces will finally fit together, in a way that works. ...Presuming that he fixes all the contradictions that I've pointed out. I already offered a solution to one of them.. (Yes, I'M the one saying FNAF is filled with contradictions. I've already gave up on FNAF.)

If you're talking about Ferret's defense of Story Potential, while he does bring up the author, he only mentions contradictions in the easy theories, the popular ones. He's saying the theories are wrong, not the game.

He doesn't try to mess up franchises, or blame the author for faults in his theories. He just presumes that the best story is always the correct one. While I argue that the story that best fits the evidence is the correct one. Though fortunately, these two overlap far more often than not-Mostly because he takes into account evidence as well, but tips the scale if a better story is found.

The best way to approach this is to present evidence, and make a proper rebuttal. Everyone involved would learn a lot. After all, me and Ferret did!

...Though I still haven't made my rebuttal to Chapter 7, have I?

--

PS:So, while writing this post, Ferret made a response on the real reason. ...It's not what I thought. Though I suppose eliminating what could be considered a serious accusation of betrayal works as well.

I don't think the FNAF wiki will delete this, though I'm not sure whether or not they have jurisdiction to judge Ferret over at their wiki for what happened here. It could really go either way, and I understand why Ferret wouldn't want to risk it.

Chapter 7 is probably still the next thing I'll be working on, though. Proper evidence is what's important. And I do have things to clarify as to why I still place Gaster's fall after the second human (yes, I'm counting Chara) fell, and make a new and revised rebuttal against the new and improved theory of Sans being future Frisk. (Which may happen in later chapters rather than just Chapter 7, but who said I was stopping at 7?)