Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-27136653-20171022163748

The artifacts and the jigsaw puzzle were all just jokes. Of course the two don't act the same, but they represent each other. That's more than obvious. All I'm saying is, that the dog doesn't HAVE to be Toby in the game, but when it is explicitly stated so, even through hinting, you must accept it as it is, meaning the only thing you can then do in order to preserve logic is to ignore it. You cannot change the meaning.

And why are you saying that Guzusuru did actual code? I mean, if it's true, then I wonder why Toby didn't address it. But if it turns out that Guzusuru just creted the animation frames (which isn't programming), and then Toby encoded them (made them move using the code), then you're a literal ass.

So please, prove to me that Guzusuru did the actual animation code, like:

var z = 0; loop { z++; } animFrame[z%20].show;

Meaning they did help Toby with the code, and didn't just draw the individual frames using some simple animation software, and then sent them to Toby so that he could program them into the actual game all by himself?