Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20181123023529/@comment-32182236-20181218025435

It'll take a while before I make my response, but something I have to clarify in the meantime, because this is a big one.

Sans eating Gaster was an alternative to Sans being human. I was saying this could explain his human-level power in a different way, without the need for calling him human. So why can't we say Sans is a monster after all? (I was first going to call you out on using circular reasoning, saying Sans couldn't have been a monster eating Gaster because he had to be a human, but I realized perhaps you didn't understand my argument.)