Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27524978-20160210030742/@comment-4383275-20160819024348

PyroGothNerd wrote: Cheeseskates wrote: Exactly. His brain is overworked, I think. That is just my assumption. As someone who watched Matpat for a long time before finally unsubscribing, I can tell you what's going on: He stopped putting in effort. You can easily see giant holes in his more recent theories. He's even been doing a bad job providing scientific facts.


 * Pyro's gender: He used unfounded research, and purposefully (and visibly) mismeasured Pyro's head to body ratio, while also ignoring how thick fire-proof suits are.


 * Phone Guy is Purple Guy: He completely ignored the fact Purple Guy is smiling in almost every scene, meaning his smiling in one particular scene means nothing.

He doesn't care if there's any accuracy, so long as he gets a lot of views. Honestly, I'm a huge fan of the channel, but I have to agree with most of these critiques. Toby Fox never explicitly debunked this theory, though, and most of the "videos" I've seen are uttterly nonsensical, but the other critiques are spot-on. I was also unimpressed by the inaccuracies in his video on Sonic's speed, specifically because the height measurements for Sonic that he used were falsified and came from a non-canon game in the series.
 * Sans is Ness: There are entire videos on everything he did wrong in that one, plus Toby Fox himself almost immediately said it was wrong.
 * The "Peach is evil" twist at the end of the parasitic fungus theory: While the rest of the theory was decent, his little twist at the end ignored the fact that Toads were seen with her when she was a baby, the fact the name "Toadstool" was a mistranslation, and loads of other problems.

With all that said, this is why there are multiple different series on the channel. If you don't like Game Theory, you can try Gaijin Goombah's videos. If you don't like those, there's Deadlock. Livestreaming, video game trivia, analysis of game mechanics, you name it!

Now, has anyone thought of any new potential ways to disprove this theory that haven't been discussed above?