Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-27136653-20171023044215

That's right. And I guess 2+2 is not 4 in Undertale, because it wasn't explicitly stated, right?

Toby said that his tweets aren't canon, but just because he often posts bullshit. Differentiating between that and the other stuff is important. Just like it is important to differentiate between stuff that makes sense, and stuff that was meant to be a meta joke within the game. Since the game is full of that. It's time you realize that not everything in the game was meant to make sense. Undertale is not that deep, really.

And also, the awards are an important piece of evidence. If you can say that about stuff, then I can too. Since the Annoying Dog was in that video, and since that award was meant for Toby Fox, then it means that it's not just a joke, it's a reality that his avatar is the dog. So then, what do you think, is the dog in the game a doppleganger? Not really, if you no longer have any reason to believe it is.

If it's true that the Annoying Dog is Toby's avatar, based on proof from a source other than Twitter, then the dog in the game must also be that same dog, since there's no incentive to believe that it's actually two different dogs. And there is no paradox if we do it my way anyways. I excluded it from the canon. You changed facts. Both ways work, but my doesn't assume bullshit.

And show me proof that Guzusuru did any code while at it. They could have just polished the animations, and you don't need to use Gamemaker Studio's code for that.