Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20200214154305/@comment-26907577-20200214154858

Well, you see, it allows us to derive the idea of the burden of proof completely from scratch.

Does it?

But Alice said that the proposition is TRUE, not indeterminate. Therefore, she has the burden of proof, since indeterminate is not the same thing as true.

Ah, okay. Since it's already indeterminate, you don't need to present any evidence to claim it's indeterminate.

I take no issue with any of this.