Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20200127163832/@comment-33883848-20200128175502

"I use speculatios to support another speculations? Sorry, could you show a specific example? I'm using speculation to explain facts, when alternative explanations are more speculative. Or I try to."

Example: when you say that Chara expect Frisk to kill Asgore to take his soul and destroy everything as otherwise, it runs against another speculation of yours: that Chara wants to destroy humanity.

"Chara can make a true reset as proven by the genocide ending. That was no Reset. That was an un-ERASE. How do you explain Chara leaving the option in True Pacifist but not in Genocide? If you can't, well, a speculative argument is better than "plot hole!" (not that you would pin it on a plot hole.)"

They recreate the world with a true reset when they asked your soul.

"Well, how do we know that they know what they have?"

Because they can feel it having a "perverted sentimentality" a feeling that they don't undertand.

"Yes, I did: There is no master plan. At first, I was so confused."

Seriously, then what are you trying to prove here?