Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-32182236-20171023124427

Technically, "plus" in of itself was never explicitly used-Neither in Undertale, nor in the real world is it anything more than a made-up symbol, to represent addition. And in Undertale, you CAN prove that 2+2=4, the same way we do here-Die twice to Sans, that's 2, then twice again, Sans counts four. Also, the dog being Toby isn't as absolute as math. What we see in the game is empirical evidence for the world we're theorizing. As I said earlier, any paradoxes that may have existed at one point (Like Papyrus surviving being killed long enough to watch Undyne spot you for the first time in v1.0, despite not being a Boss Monster) were fixed in a patch,

There's no proper way to do so, though. That would be like analyzing what part of a fanfiction is canon, without ever having seen the game it's based off of. Therefore, to prevent false evidence from "debunking" possibilities that may very well be true, I'm playing it safe and considering NONE of his tweets as reliable sources.

Also, that kickstarter I used? It's the only appearance (outside the trailer, which I already debunked canonicity of) of the annoying dog as Toby. So calling THAT unreliable also knocks out your only real evidence that the annoying dog was ever seriously Toby Fox.

The dog in the game is neither a doppleganger nor Toby's avatar-Toby's avatar literally does not exist according to Undertae's canon. Do note that Greater Dog ALSO looks like the Toby avatars, when not wearing armor-So Toby could have just used the sprite and gave it new meaning-And later joked that it WAS him in his tweets.

As for the awards, like I said, there's two possibilities. The first is, he doesn't want his face shown to the millions of people who could see that video. (And if this is the reason, I repsect that decision-Not wanting to take the risk of possibly being tracked down, or followed around by hundreds of fans asking for an autograph.) As a result, what else to use other than the one thing he joked around saying he is? A dog! The second is he's joking with us, like Scott Cawthon tends to do a lot regarding serious things about his games. ;)

Excluding it from the canon is changing facts-Specifically, flat-out deleting them! Why not exclude Frisk from the canon while we're at it, and say we're playing as Chara? It'd sure make the naming screen a lot more normal! I, however, ignored "evidence" that comes from an unreliable source:His tweets (which one of said tweets can't he considered as canon proof), and the trailer (which I debunk in this post). All that remains is the kickstarter itself, which we're currently discussing. If it's not trustworthy, then there goes the final piece of evidence that Toby is the annoying dog. If it IS... What happened to the Undertale comics? How do Sans and Papyrus know about modern Surface money? What happened to Papyrus' cool song? And, of course, there comes the Guzusuru discussion. Hence, I consider that we ARE indeed assuming stuff by saying the dog MUST be Toby. And like I said earlier, It would be 211X Toby, because of Frisk.

Polishing the animations is coding. After polishing them in, Toby would only need to import it into the game by just copy/pasting the code, letting it get converted if the two use different languages...