Thread:ChildOfTheMoon3/@comment-5956954-20170516091426/@comment-5956954-20170516115251

I recommend taking heed to my advice regardless. I can't fix the page myself since I am too busy with school, so it will either stay or conform. You otherwise have your own freedom. It must be filled with facts, not disputable speculation.

Anyways, my responses:
 * 1) Mettaton was a ghost. They became one with the machinery Alphys made. How to prove? Cousin of Napstablook and their diary entries, a ghost possessing a dummy and even becoming one with it, and Papyrus dubbing the ghost who Mettaton once was "HAPPSTABLOOK, THE HAPPY GHOST." Even if it is not confirmed, the conclusion has indisputable evidence in the game.


 * 1) Alphys created Flowey. Asriel's dust sprinkled in the middle of the garden as stated during the walk through New Home, and Alphys was nervous to hear a tiny flower convinced Papyrus to meet everyone in the barrier room. From this, it can be concluded the game intended the player to see it was Alphys who created Flowey (as in Mettaton's quiz, Alphys also gets nervous from the protagonist choosing Asgore) as a gift. Gaster has the same amount of evidence, though more speculative (for example, the neater sentence structures can mean anything and the red faces in the last wall panels could also mean anything).


 * 1) Chara was not evil but misanthropic or possibly sadistic. That is in the past. They came back as some demon that gained power through feeding on someone's genocide and then destroyed the game world, killing everything. They are smart enough to know what "sentimentality" means, so they are smart enough to know killing is wrong, but they do it anyway. That is evil.


 * 1) The narrator Chara theory can also be twisted to be seen as the protagonist thinking, reflecting or talking to and on themselves, being mostly extroverted. Sans is the only character in the game to see and mention the protagonist's facial expressions and body gestures and make responses without their oral input, so this acts as proof.


 * Everything else you can fix. I don't agree with what is said in the 6th paragraph's first sentence either.

I personally don't care because Undertale itself is simply too speculative as people look into these details too much. Undertale should be dead for having its endless speculatory nature backfire against itself. Overall, I would prefer no speculation unless there is indisputable evidence supporting the process of elimination, the abductive reasoning, or the general sight.