Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31371445-20170222233857/@comment-32182236-20180820162824

Tsskyx wrote: They don't. Or at least, not until you prove it. Because if after 3 years we all still believe contradictory theories, that proves the absence of a conscise story line, if anything. That's because for all those years, we've all made some assumptions regarding it. We've all tried using the meta to determine canonicity, and gotten things wrong. Most of those who argue Chara is always good cite the fact that "the moral is that nobody is truly evil", while those who say that Chara corrupted Frisk.. "Since when were you the one in control?" likely triggered it. ..But that's because at that point, Chara has overpowered Frisk. We can control Frisk just fine up until LV19. If everyone keeps on creating interpretations of what they think Toby meant, instead of just looking strictly at the game itself, they're going to reach contradicting beliefs, because nobody but Toby himself truly knows what his intentions were. Because his intentions can't be determined, what's the best course of action? Well, how about just going with what he gave us? You know, the actual game? Also, we have contradicting beliefs about THIS world as well, and we're not arguing that this world was made by a designer who just wanted to tell a story and didn't make consistent laws now, are we?