Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20181123023529/@comment-32182236-20181218204421

You ruled out Chara and Asriel. Which was a great job, by the way.

I'm not saying Papyrus is human. I'm saying more evidence supports him being fake than Sans. Might as well be neither of the two. (He's probably a real monster, though.) If Sans is Ness, Papyrus is a Starman.

You do make a point of it not vanishing or seeping out. Good job again. (I must have thought ketchup was human food somehow..) Now, let's see if Sans has gone to Grillby's in the Genocide Route or not.. If he has, problem solved, he can still be a monster, if he hasn't...

Being cut short can still be an accident. If his death didn't naturally come of age, his life was cut short. And the only time we see Gaster is just appear behind a grey door and vanish when you go near him. That doesn't look like revenge!

I still say it was Mettaton NEO who appeared in the shadows. Not EX, we debunked that earlier. NEO.

There is significance to Entry 17. It describes the Darkest Experiment. Oh, the other one? Describes the reason wht the Amalgamtes happened. That's not insignificant at all! And by the way, have you looked the other 20 entries in the game? Doesn't seem like Post-It Notes. They're on some kind of computer device. Said it before, private entries. You're just assuming because the numbers are the same, they HAVE to be linked, because that's what you choose to believe, even as I showed that's utterly paradoxial, and would separately invalidiate your claim that the entry was to Sans and Papyrus.

You need to use evidence for EVERY claim. Not just some of them. Congrats, you proved the statue wasn't to Asriel or Chara! Doesn't suddenly make the rest of your statements true. And it needs to be sufficient evidence. Which, once again, you managed to do when it came to Chara's death, and thus, whether or not the statue was Chara. But doing it for one claim doesn't substitue as doing it for all claims.

You can show me a bunch of vague connections, but that's not enough. I need empirical evidence, not "Oh, a small similarity! That means the two are physically linked!" Types of "evidence" abolished by the Scientific Revolution were abolished for a reason.