Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28814491-20170506023810/@comment-27701762-20170506202313

PipMcGee wrote: The idea that Alphys could be the author of the lowercase entries is possible, but since Alphys can write formal English, why doesn't she in logs 9 and after? Because she is stressed. You can even look back over the entries and see that the proper and lowercase entries map perfectly onto how well the experiments are going: at the beginning she is optimistic and writes in proper English, then things start going poorly (Entry 9 specifically starts "things aren't going well"), then the monsters start getting better in Entry 14, then in Entry 16 everything goes poorly again (this, by the way, would be a Sans/Napstablook entry, since it isn't written in proper English, but is not in all lowercase, meaning Entry 16 has to invalidate the theory on its own logic), and since things don't recover from there the remaining entries are written in lowercase.

There is no discrepancy between the proper and lowercase entries. There are numerous discrepancies that come up if we follow the theory that there are multiple authors.

Also, Alphys using all lowercase in undernet does not disprove that Sans and Napstablook are the only two who speak in lowercase. Alphys Undernet posts aren't speech, they are typed. Sans and Napstablook, however, literally speak in lowercase, somehow. My point is that it fits Napstablook's way of speaking more than it does Alphys's. This is a non-sequitor then. Your argument runs: 1) These typed entries are in all lowercase. 2) The only characters who speak in all lowercase are Sans and Napstablook. 3) Alphys types in lowercase for UnderNet, but speaks in proper English. 4) Therefore, these typed entries are authored by Sans or Napstablook.

The logic does not follow in any way.

Also, she's done a lot of lying to protect herself, and she admits that. Maybe, however, she wanted to protect Napstablook. Maybe they worked together on Mettaton's body, but Napstablook didn't want credit for it. This isn't an argument. There is no evidence whatsoever that Napstablook worked on Mettaton's body, so you've invented a story that has no basis in the game's narrative or dialogue to explain the lack of evidence, and this story is proof that your theory is right.