Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-27136653-20171023220234

Well duh, of course they aren't canon. And I think the awards ceremony or whatever is just as important as the unimportant stuff he posts on Twitter. We should look for all references where the annoying dog is seen, we shouldn't cherrypick °3°

And a paradox doesn't have to be a proof for anything, it's just a hinderance, that must be explained using better theories, for which proof is used. I offered to solve it by dismissing the room altogether, which is a reasoning I based on the indirect proof. Your reasoning dismisses the indirect proof for some reason, and goes with something for which there's no proof altogether, direct nor indirect.

And for the last time, stop saying that that one line implies the dog did it all by himself. It doesn't imply that, since there's no word "the" in it. All the line says, is that the dog made SOME whole game. It doesn't say which one, it doesn't say whether he did it alone or whether he had any help, it doesn't say anything, except for the fact that it's a whole game. Also, plural has nothing to do with this, "a" isn't used for plural.