Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20200127163832/@comment-26907577-20200128170309

I use speculatios to support another speculations ? Sorry, could you show a specific example? I'm using speculation to explain facts, when alternative explanations are more speculative. Or I try to.
 * Chara can make a true reset as proven by the genocide ending.
 * That was no Reset . That was an un- ERASE . How do you explain Chara leaving the option in True Pacifist but not in Genocide? If you can't, well, a speculative argument is better than "plot hole!" (not that you would pin it on a plot hole.)


 * Whatever or not Chara remembers is irevelant. They have Frisk's soul and they aren't stupid to not undertand that they have Frisk's soul, even if they don't remember shit.
 * Well, how do we know that they know what they have? Maybe they only figure out that they aren't meant to have the SOUL they have in the ending. Any ending. Again, what is your explanation for them acting exactly the same up until the cutscene/postcard/void?


 * You don't any counter argument for WHY Chara doens't take control of Frisk to realize their master plan instead of waiting that Frisk will somehow carry it out.
 * Yes, I did: There is no master plan.
 * At first, I was so confused.