Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-30390828-20161120192150/@comment-24055932-20161221155134

I feel the actions of humans justifiable.

Not only do I feel the act of devouring a soul as a crime worse than killing a being (it's akin to forcing a being to total submission).The raw strength gained through devouring a single soul is so tremendous, that just a single monster's evil intent would be sufficient to end the world... without save points.

Even if the other monsters would try to support the humans, the only way to beat the evil guy would be devouring MORE humans than he does... you see where this is going, don't you?

Creating an environment void of humans for the monsters to live in actually was way more human than what is realistic. Humanity would have slaughtered them all. The mighty wizards "sealing the monsters away" would in reality be the few sympathizing with the monsters, trying to keep them save.

Going a little off topic, introducing the magic if. So you probably did a pacifist run already. So, what if Flowey lied. And didn't die, but went into hiding. A whole world filled with humans, and even if he's incapable, all he has to do is kill a few toddlers, gain their souls, and he'll be a dinosaur on a feast ground. <br With that knowledge: Are you still sure what you did was right?