Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27317758-20160606193000/@comment-26859076-20170104011952

Raythornclaw wrote: RMXStudio wrote: Raythornclaw wrote: Toby fox is uncreative and was too numb to actually make up names/endings.

This ending is more of a "filler", just like most neutral ones. I, uh, wouldn't call him "uncreative" or "too numb"--were you trying to say dumb?--considering he made a whole game with many diverse characters, a good game at that. Sure he didn't name the endings, but he did make them, and a lot of them are effects of even small differences between your choices in the game.

Also, there's a difference between an ending being unsatisfying and it being "filler", which, considering there is no other content for Undertale except for the game, there can't actually be filler. If you're dissatisfied with an ending or multiple endings, that's one thing--then again, the game seems to mostly promote pacifism than anything else, so of course the most satisfying ending will be the one the game wants you to have the most.

I honestly feel like the neutral endings are realistic based on the personalities of the characters (well, except for the Leaderless one, but, as a lot of people have explained, if you do stupid stuff in the game, you get a stupid ending, so I generally accept it).

You might want to watch your wording or some people might think you're acting like a waterlogged potato. Because, honestly, you're kinda looking like you're acting like a waterlogged potato. 1) Many people made whole games and still are retarded, but you completely missed the point.

2) Most Satisfying ending: Genocide

3) *cough cough* Dog ending *cough cough*

4) Waterlogged Potato? Sir, i owe you an award of stupidness. That is not even an insult. Expect if you are retarded.

PS) Again, you completely missed the point. Wording? I don't give a little shit. ...Hah, okay.

1) I did say it was a whole and good game. Not sure what point you're trying to make. Care to clarify?

2) That's a matter of opinion, dude. No harm there.

3) Disastisfying endings still aren't filler, especially if there's no other "official" content.

4) I wasn't trying to insult you; I brought up imagery of something odd because that's how I perceived your actions--somewhat off-kilter considering the circumstances. I have no intent of calling you something demeaning.

Please keep your award.

Calling me "retarded" says more about you than it does me.

You're actions are moving from the waterlogged potato stage to the moldy, soggy flatbread stage.

PS) Please make your point clear. Also, good for you, I guess. Just don't be surprised if people don't understand what you're trying to say. Wording's important for understanding, after all.