Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31619784-20170328162322/@comment-28517148-20170328191710

Chara simply plays the role of cosequence of Player's actions, because there are no real consequences, especially for doing genocide. So they must be made-up. That's why things like Let us erase this pointless world, and move on to the next... SINCE WHEN WERE YOU THE ONE IN CONTROL?... You want to go back to the world you destroyed... You think you are above consequences... You will give me your SOUL... and many more exists (plus post-genocide endings). Like Sans's LV Judgments: over lv14, huh... you're a pretty bad person. Even the potted plant is judging you for your sins. You, the Player, the one and only who have free will and real control here. But the worst is that the other people, who don't understand Undertale, can actually start judging Players by how they play the game. They simply do not understand that morality doesn't work here and judgment cannot be applied to this case. Also trying to logically explain how exactly Chara desrtoys the World will fail because, from player's perspective, it is made up event. They want it, they do it. Just like that. Coming back to the most important - Player stands behind every Frisk's action. In the same manner game creator stands behind every NPC's action, their dialogues and written texts. Ergo it is not about Frisk versus Chara. It always was about Player against game creator. Chara and Frisk are only a pawns.