Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5956954-20160303101737/@comment-27915465-20160304190624

I agree that Gaijin Goomba's theory is great, but i don't know why the heck people make it all complicated and try to find problems in the plain field.

1)Sans IS a monster. Because Underworld's residents resemble anthros, mythical creatures, something else AND actual monsters, so why can't Sans be a monster revenant?

2)Sans and Papyrus are actual brothers. Because skeletons and revenants are in the same "Undead Monster" monsters tree branch.

3)Sans' ability to know what he shouldn't IS explained by him being a revenant. Because all monsters are different and they ALL have their different traits (Spider monsters make webs, fish monsters can swim and breath underwater, ghost monsters can faze through solid objects, etc.), so why Sans' special trait can't be meta knowledge?

4)Sans is not bleeding, it's just ketchup. Nuff said, confirmed by Toby.

So those are the points that ENRAGED me the most and which i explained. I wish people will agree with my point of view, but it will be good anyway to hear any constructive criticizm and other opinions.