Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27907368-20160506131212/@comment-30954779-20180114173350

Reading this post i'm starting to get why Jordan Peterson (prof clinical psychology) is so much against postmodernism. I never agreed with him, thinking he oversimplified things and people with normal common sense would never go as far as Peterson is claiming. But holy sh*t are you proving me wrong. A person intelligent enough to come up with a theory like the one in this post  STILL draws the conclusion that killing everyone is the humane thing to do? It is better to kill everyone than it is to let everyone live a potentially non-optimal life? This really shows the potential danger of postmodernism and moral relativism.

If you continue this line of tought to our own world one could argue that, because for quite a lot of human lives it is a life of near-unchangable missery, and because this seems to be a never ending cycle, it would be for the best to just kill everybody... what the f*ck? I'm pretty damn sure this is not what Toby Fox had in mind, if any it would be the complete opposite. D E T E R M I N A T I O N; the willpower to choose the kind way out, no matter how hard, time and time again. Not f*cking killing everybody. lol.

Your toughts went deep in the beginning of your argument, but you should have kept on thinking a bit more before drawing that silly conclusion. Very intersting to see this remark though, never tought I would draw this big of a conclusion about the practicality of contemporary philosophy in a forum post on undertale. hah!