User:Singedstar/Blog:W.D. Gaster EXPLAINED!

 Okay, so people are making crazy theories about Gaster that would take a long shot to be true, but mine is more practical, more tame.

Basically, it's that Toby Fox made him to be an unfinished code, a mysterious spawn, that he didn't finish him to play with us. We run around trying to find who he is, digging through information that doesn't exist. Remember, this wouldn't be the first time he's done something like that, remember the things this man has done.

He left a message in the coding for hackers to hear and read, two different times. He made an entire ending devoted to stopping hackers. This is a thing he would do.

And, no evidence contradicts it. With what little information we have about him, we know that all signs point to this.

And, with the evidence that we do have that may or may not mean something else, he could have added it to throw people off.

The Gaster followers? Obviously added to throw you off.

Any other evidence?

No, not really. People try to link Gaster and Sans, but they have zero connection. But, for this theory, lets say that they are connected.

I, personally, believe MatPat's theory on Sans, that he is Ness. But many don't, so lets disregard that.

So, a strange machine, a pin, a photo album, strange blueprints, and a drawing of three people that says, "Don't forget."

What does that have to do with Gaster? Well, we can't really link the photo album, pin, and drawing, so let's work with what we can.

Sans has a machine and blueprints. So what? That doesn't mean Gaster designed it or built it. We can't really make a connection.

So, in conclusion, no one can prove this theory wrong.

Though, even if it were right, Toby Fox would want to keep it secret, so he wouldn't say.

So no one can prove it correct either.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Ah, the beauty of theorizing.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Bye! Okay, so people are making crazy theories about Gaster that would take a long shot to be true, but mine is more practical, more tame.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Basically, it's that Toby Fox made him to be an unfinished code, a mysterious spawn, that he didn't finish him to play with us. We run around trying to find who he is, digging through information that doesn't exist. Remember, this wouldn't be the first time he's done something like that, remember the things this man has done.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">He left a message in the coding for hackers to hear and read, two different times. He made an entire ending devoted to stopping hackers. This is a thing he would do.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">And, no evidence contradicts it. With what little information we have about him, we know that all signs point to this.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">And, with the evidence that we do have that may or may not mean something else, he could have added it to throw people off.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">The Gaster followers? Obviously added to throw you off.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Any other evidence?

<p style="font-weight:normal;">No, not really. People try to link Gaster and Sans, but they have zero connection. But, for this theory, lets say that they are connected.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">I, personally, believe MatPat's theory on Sans, that he is Ness. But many don't, so lets disregard that.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">So, a strange machine, a pin, a photo album, strange blueprints, and a drawing of three people that says, "Don't forget."

<p style="font-weight:normal;">What does that have to do with Gaster? Well, we can't really link the photo album, pin, and drawing, so let's work with what we can.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Sans has a machine and blueprints. So what? That doesn't mean Gaster designed it or built it. We can't really make a connection.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">So, in conclusion, no one can prove this theory wrong.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Though, even if it were right, Toby Fox would want to keep it secret, so he wouldn't say.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">So no one can prove it correct either.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Ah, the beauty of theorizing.

<p style="font-weight:normal;">Bye!

<p style="font-weight:normal;">