Board Thread:Wiki Discussion/@comment-25958552-20160731111602/@comment-28517148-20171209103226

''Yes, the experience is different, but you said that ruins consistency. It doesn't-Frisk can be in a comic and the comic be canon.'' There will be no consistency (both for Player's experience and story) if comic book will be made after game that has three different endings, but I don't know if there will be any comics or attempts to expand the game's universe.

We should use ONLY the canon when analyzing the game Until the moment when game tries to break the fourth wall or some NPC indirectly mentions about Players. Also people ... constantly accusing Player for doing this or that are still problem. Anyway, I still able to use canon and reality interchangeably.

''Flowey's motive:Do evil because he's curious, and he can just reload Your motive:Do evil because you're curious, and you can just reload ...Yeah, I don't see the difference. Of course, Flowey isn't a shadow for the nonexistent player, but for the Frisk that does Genocide because they're curious.'' Looks like you are looking at things in different way than I am by ingoring Player's existance and their influence on the game. Interesting way of thinking.

''If we want to know whether or not Chara's evil, we look at the canon. Otherwise you get stuff like this1, and even this2.'' I have watched the first, which is very interesting and quite accurate except some minor details. The second is just another exaggerated theory about what if, so I don't care about it too much. However I have noticed that you have interesting way of thinking and drawing conclusions.