Board Thread:General Discussion v2.0/@comment-27234286-20151118175310/@comment-3087260-20180402024001

Cookie-Owl wrote: Gamma Venom 567 wrote: Freddy Fanatic wrote: Cookie-Owl wrote: It would be nice for a sequel, but what if you did Genocide? Then the sequel would really only count if you did True Pacifist and ended it there. Plus, to be completely honest, Undertale isn't as popular as it used to be. The sequel would never be as popular as Undertale. Assuming you did Genocide but didn’t accept Chara’s offer upon restarting the game, perhaps the sequel could open with Chara’s request to take your SOUL? Or if you did a Soulless Pacifist Route, the game will pick up from there.

But, in all seriousness, I’d be fine without a sequel. The True Pacifist Ending wraps up thing quite nicely, but I wouldn’t be against a sequel either. It dosen't really wrap up everything dude. Does it have to? There are some things left in the game that are meant to be left there. Once Asriel turned back into a flower, what happened? Almost anything about the fallen kids. Literally anything about Gaster.

True Pacifist wraps up things that needed to be wrapped up. The monsters became free. Where Frisk goes after the route (you can choose to stay with Toriel or not). All of the things I stated in the last paragraph? They don't need to be to wrapped up. Then you know nothing. Also the kickstarter stated that the final stretch goal stated that the comic and another game would expand the world of undertale dude can't believe your igonring this.