Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-27136653-20171021014658

2060 is the AI singularity. It may take us several centuries to fully unveil the process of aging at will. Lemme ask you a question. Is that your plan? To get an "immortality" shot somewhere around 2060 and then live forever like nothing? To my knowledge, we're good as species, but not that good. I think you watched too many sci-fi movies, or just got your terms confused. Or you're just mentally retarded. I see that as a rising option too.

"Show me proof within the game that the Annoying Dog represents Toby"

Are you braindead? Of course there is none within the game. The proof is that Toby made that character, and then pretended that he is him. Literally. If you followed his tweets, you would know what I'm talking about. The Annoying Dog isn't like his intelligent imaginary partner or something, he IS him.

" You either explain the evidence under your theory"

But you can't. Your theory can't explain what I wrote above, since the Annoying Dog representing Toby, while not canon confirmed, is an established fact. Established from the outside.

And the monster in the intro WAS supposed to have two horns. As I said, Temmie Chang corrected Toby's work in the story booklet. The monster was never supposed to look like it has only one horn. Besides, it is a weak argument, to say that it was Asgore's father. Just like it is a weak argument to assume that the game isn't Undertale, simply because the logo is unrecognizible.

Cherrypicking evidence is not okay, and yet, you're doing it too. You are putting one insignificant argument against ten others and claiming that you're correct. I don't see how the logo can serve as a proof against my claims, just like I don't see how a bad piece of canon artwork changes who the boss monster in the intro is. For what we know, that mushroom could just be the classic black/white sprite of Flowey.