Thread:TheHumanAmbassador/@comment-26907577-20190903100614/@comment-32182236-20190913183157

That would result in the same effects as what I already did with the integral-That's why I used the integral method in the first place. It's the closest I can get.

I think I've gone too far into complexity for me to even get it anymore. And now that I think of it, my model does seem to exactly match it-If making Frisk's fall a determined state, defined as the last human, changed the odds of the other 7 humans falling in that timeframe, that would imply that Frisk's fall is determined by the others. Which we all know isn't true.

So I think the answer I gave, 1920, is the most accurate we can get. That is, unless we find a way to account for the acceleration of the growth factor, and/or the Native Americans that existed prior to the colonies.