Talk:Chara/@comment-35274572-20180525000303/@comment-4015220-20180605023800

"Chara didn't talk to Frisk until the end of genocide because Frisk does exactly what they want them to do in genocide." AH HA! You just proved my point, "Frisk does exactly what they want want them to do in genocide." If that's what Chara wanted then that makes them EVIL, regardless of what route you choose, THAT is something that they will always want. Or are you going to tell me that I'm misunderstanding again? If so, then please, explain what it is that I've misunderstood.

"I'm convinced you have some sort of memory problem. You're the one who brought up "You're forgetting that at the end of the True Pacifist route, Flowey asks Chara not to do a Reset and to let Frisk be happy." I asked you a question on who you think has the reset ability at the end of True pacifist route and beforehand made a response to that point." I think you're the one with the memory problem, I brought that up because YOU said that Chara wasn't evil in the True Pacifist route! And your question didn't give me a reason to answer. Why? Because its OBVIOUS that Frisk has that ability, it's so obvious that anyone who's played the game can answer that question. Its not a question, its STATING the obvious!

Flowey is making assumptions? How do you figure that, huh? What EVIDENCE is there to SUGGEST that Flowey's speech is just an assumption? Explain that. Oh, and Flowey was leading them to the Pacifist route? No he wasn't, he was lying to them so he could get what he wanted. Did his actions not make that clear for you?