Board Thread:General Discussion v2.0/@comment-27234286-20151118175310/@comment-27123306-20160125162132

Roadside Picnic wrote: S4N7I4G0 wrote: Roadside Picnic wrote: SkrublordJacob wrote: People say the sequel would be bad, or ruin it, or whatever, but I disagree. I do believe Toby could make a proper sequel that's just as good, if not better than the first one. And yeah, a prequel would be nice. Well, they do have a point. What makes Undertale so good is its thouroughness. It's a grand, epic journey that wraps up perfectly, leaving no loose ends. Stories like that usually don't do well with sequels, because its picking up where there frankly shouldnt have been a story

So it cuts both ways. I want to see a continuation, certainly, but I understand where others may have concerns. well, there are still some loose ends, like how frisk crosses the barrier in the neutral ending loose ends referring to an unresolved conflict. Everything had settled, the characters have moved on in life.

However, with the concept of "resetting" being a physical force in the undertale world, its very well possible we could take any drawback to Frisk's quest and have the protagonist say, "that's not good enough". Which then could spur a sequel. I agree. What if the entire thing reset, but there were change to the plot? New characters were introduced, maybea new antagonist that overrides your power to save. Kind of like chara or flowey during his battle, but contiuiously through the game. Just a though.