Talk:Chara/@comment-30937172-20180114212003/@comment-30701659-20180115030430

Here's the thing though. While I also agree Chara isn't a cut try good guy, I'm still against them beeing a full on genocidal maniac for a simple reason: It doesn't make sense from a lore standpoint.

We know Chara hates humanity, but in the eniter game, there is little to support Chara also hating monsters. The Dreemurs gave her a home, and a loving family, when nobody else would. She commited a very slow, painful, and agonizing suicide to give monster kind a chance to be free. There's also the lines from the Genocide run that support them not hating monsters.

"You want to go back to the world you destroyed. 'It was you who pushed everything to its edge. 'I't was you who led the world to its destruction. 'But you cannot accept it. ''You think you are above consequences." ''

​"'But. 'You and I are not the same, are we? 'This SOUL resonates with a strange feeling. 'T'here is a reason you continue to recreate this world. 'There is a reason you continue to destroy it. You."

​And finally

"Despite this. 'I feel obligated to suggest. 'Should you choose to recreate this world once more. Another path would be better suited."

​This shows Chara isn't as black and white as people often say. She isn't entierly good, but not entierly evil. But, I'm not denying what has been brought up for evil Chara. Chara may actually suffer from a form of multiple personality disorder, gained when being reborn and attached to Frisk. Half of Chara is still the good person she was before, the other half being the evil we commonly assoceate with the genocide run. ​This could explain why Chara's end of genocide run diaouge is so iconcistent. The two sides are trying to both influence Frisk at the same time.

Yes I know this is stupid. Feel free to compleatly poke my theory/idea.