Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26907577-20191002153041/@comment-32182236-20191010172018

I'm just going to say it's inconclusive for now, then. Until we find someone who IS a sociologist, we don't know how probable this hypothesis is.

So it seems to be the best we have, until we can find another one. Or explain that bit about Frisk and Chara that puts a big hole in that wizard hypothesis.

Chara and Frisk were both meant to be the future of humans and monsters, if we believe what Asgore said.

And Chara and Frisk both, in Pacifist, freed the monsters.

However, it's possible for Frisk to simply kill all the monsters instead. Not very sensible for a reincarnated wizard who wanted the Barrier down.

That leaves us with these possibilities.


 * Somehow it is sensible for the Determination Wizard to change their mind and kill everyone. Not sure how, though. And if it's the luck of reincarnation giving you new personalities, then it wouldn't make sense for said wizard to both be smart enough to come up with this plan, and not smart enough to notice this clear problem. (Then again, Newton believed in alchemy, so it's not impossible...)
 * Something or someone is making Frisk kill monsters
 * Frisk wasn't a part of the plan-They beat the Determination Wizard to Ebott (They're the one that freed the monsters in Pacifist, and Toriel mentions that it's been a long time since a human fell. I'd say it was around time for Frisk to fall. Which means it probably isn't likely. But hey, it's compatable with Chara not being Frisk, so.. I guess that's a plus?)
 * The Genocide Ending is non-canon (Unless we find actual evidence that it's non-canon, we shouldn't go with this.)
 * The wizard hypothesis is FALSE.