Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20160613103837/@comment-27089028-20160619090108

Thanatos-Zero wrote: Starscream1998 wrote:

Isthereaplace wrote: Sorry, but I know both. The first is good, but I didn't need it to believe in most of what it tries to explain. The second doesn't really appeal to me.

I'm here for what this thread holds, not to do some crusading and converting. Same, the second one doesn't hold strong as Flowey states what a SOUL is at the beginning and this acronym is just needlessly complex. Then tell me, how can a supposingly soulless spirit (Chara) exist in the first place?

Simple, he's not soulless.