Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27524978-20160210030742/@comment-28394344-20160804143453

Oobooglunk wrote: H.N. H.N. Elly wrote: But do these similarities require Sans to be Ness? I might agree on Sans sharing those for the sake of Ness if they are treated as references to Ness, after all... Certainly not! Since the Duck Test is a form of inductive, not deductive, reasoning, Sans could only ever PROBABLY be Ness. All I'm trying to do is to open the minds of people who say it's "crazy" or "impossible." And I'm sure this isn't what Toby Fox originally intended, as this is all just artistic interpretation through logical analysis, but the idea's not as far-fetched as it may seem, nor has Toby explicitly debunked it or refuted it. Oh, i see now!

i've kinda expressed my view on the other points, though, so may i retire from the discussion at this point... well, unless something more and/or outstanding will come up. :)