Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-31067473-20170714200704/@comment-28517148-20170820185852

Not when compared to Us. You would'n call Frisk the human knowing that they are mindless golem made of pixels and data streams controlled by real human, the Player, aren't you? Neither human, nor child. The same goes to six humans with the difference that they are NPCs. Or they would be, because in game we can only see their leftovers - Souls. However, that is what reality says. Now cut it off and forget about the Player, so only virtual world remains and you can freely call all of them humans or even kids, like canon says. Frisk described by canon - a human child. Frisk defined by the reality - the playable character. Two different points of view used to make two different definitions. Both correct. Both incompatible. It is good to have it in mind while making good argumentation.