Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-36097492-20180901023019/@comment-32182236-20180918011001

Once again, how am I, as Frisk, supposed to know that monsters don't want to absorb human SOULs, when all the info I have is that those who enter never return, that humans won a battle against them, and by the time I read the Waterfall plaques, we already know Asgore wants to kill me and destroy humanity?

When you make your judgements, please act like you're talking to the GENOCIDE Frisk, not someone who played the Neutral Route first. Because that's exactly the role I'm taking right now.

Yes, I eradicated the monsters. I will not deny this. I will also not deny that this means no more enemies-World is saved, after all, that's the whole plot of an RPG. Their problem is taking the fact that I destroyed what I thought of as my mortal enemy, and then extrapolated that and said I wanted to destroy the world. No, I wanted to SAVE the world, Chara!

Also, I have no problem with the second genocide run (at least not alone-There is a problem when linked with the post-geno pacifist ending) My problems are with the destruction of the world, the SOUL exchange, and the post-genocide pacifist ending. I talked about the first, the second is that we have your typical selling your soul to a demon (specifically, the one who comes when you call their name), and the third is linked to the second-Where they posess you and pretty much kill everyone, going against their so-called merciful principals (like when they say maybe you should do a pacifist in the second genocide ending. This is the "problem" with the second genocide run I was referring to)

-

Of course I'm no real hero, and the monsters aren't actually evil. But reasonably, someone could believe this in the context of the game's story. Frisk could believe this. That in their warped mentality, they're doing humanity a favor. This is what I was trying to capture. No desire to destroy the world. THAT'S my point, making Chara destroying the world "because of us" baseless.