Talk:Frisk/@comment-30722447-20161210210412

Tobyfox's intention of open interpretation is pretty clear. However, the mountain of discussion on an irrelevant characteristic overshadows and taints the light-hearted approach he intended as well.

Seriously, is there any other topic going on over this character other than their sexual demeanor? Why does this matter the most? The only reason it could have possibly gone this far is people being too territorial over something that has proven itself to be a non-factor in the narrative. The persistent tug-of-war completely misses the point of Frisk being interpretable in the first place.

You might not care what Frisk is, but can you stop trying to flag them for your own agenda? It's a video game ffs