Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190820122909/@comment-32182236-20191126171235

Alright, I'm back. Hopefully I'll be able to find your notes on Mother 1, because I decided that to make things a bit more interesting, and to make the disconnect between the Mother Interlude and the main rebuttal project at least a little bit less jarring, I'll be responding to your notes on Mother 1, as I'm analyzing Mother 1-And I'll continue to do this for the other games as well.

When you're done with Mother 3, are you going to analyze the Earthbound Halloween Hack on its own merit? That's what I plan to do in the fourth part of the Mother Interlude (after the Mother Trilogy), to set up my response to Chapter 10.)

If so, I'll be responding to that as well. Though this time, it'll look like both of us are learning, as my responses will be in tandem with your comments.

I'm also here because I realized an old claim of mine has been put to rest. You were right to say that copyright should be left out of this. Remember this?

"But this does mean that Toby will NEVER be able to reveal that Sans is Ness! The revelation legally cannot ever happen! (At least not until Earthbound is in the public domain.) Not unless Nintendo and Toby Fox partner up on this."

Nintendo and Toby Fox have actually partnered up. Because Sans is in Smash.

So, no more copyright.

Now, let's see if I can make Part 5 of my Mother Analysis. (Or Part 6, if you count my Part 4.5 as Part 5)