Board Thread:Applications/@comment-27036118-20160222192216/@comment-27371825-20160320233015

Photojournalism wrote: Hey, I'm photo, and I would like to become a patroller for the wiki!

I've been active on the wiki for a while, and I'm well known by most of the admins/chat mods, so there's the first requirement.

Since my first time reaching out to the community, I have tried to help people know more and get in touch with the community. I feel like I use the manual of style everywhere (in real life, other websites, etc.), so there's the second requirement finished.

Whenever I see a new edit, something ticks in me to see it and make sure its real, so I do not flip a coin when there is uncertainty.

With the patroller rank, I think that I could help the wiki be best it can be by reviewing edits and such. Thanks for reading this application. If I'm not right for the position, then I understand and would like to know what I'm doing wrong. Have a great day!

RESPONSE: Denied, for now. You're not doing anything wrong per say, but I feel like at this point, you haven't done enough to merit this promotion. You show initiative, and that's great, but although you have a decent number of edits on the wiki, few of them are to articles, and I'm not sure how must I trust your ability to deem edits as good or bad. However, if you can prove that you'd be a valuable asset to the team over the next few weeks, then I might re-evaluate your application. Tips: Next time, use proper grammar when you apply. This is a postion involving editing, and correct grammar is the minimum for such a position. The absense of grammar in this context demonstrates a lack of professionalism. You're a good member of the community, but I don't think you're the best for this position.

Hello again staff! I would like to re-aply for the patroller rank. Along with the above I now have made a lot more edits, am currently working on fixing the music pages with KockaAdmiralic, and carefully watch the edits. Thank you for reading this! I hope to be accepted!