Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-33310970-20171117184418/@comment-28517148-20171118164127

''My theory is that it's just Chara in there, moving around, talking to people, giving us choices and following what we decide. There is no Frisk. Frisk is just a name.'' So, from where they got the body? Remember that their orginal body has died from poisoning (The next day. The next day. ... The human died.) and is currently rotting from several months under the ground (...She must have taken you when she left. And decided to give you a proper burial, rather than... Hanging out in the basement forever...). Did someone fell into Underground and Chara took their without doubt empty body (...human cannot absorb a human SOUL...) or is this majik?

''I always was a crybaby, wasn't I,  ... I know. You're not actually , are you? 's been gone for a long time. ... Um... what... What IS your name?'' Your entire theory is based on this dialogue, but your claim that  says Frisk is just simplification of quite overcomplicated relation between Frisk and .

''Best support: Chara is a red soul, Frisk is a red soul, there are never two red souls in the game but we know Chara is there the whole time. (I suppose if you don't believe in NaraChara you wouldn't believe this part though.)'' Fact that there are no two red Souls shown in the same time leads to conclusion that either Frisk or Chara doesn't have a Soul: ''See that heart? That is your SOUL'' - Flowey. If monsters can so easely see Souls and drag them onto bullet board, then we should see two Souls that are occupying the same body, but nothing like this happiend. It is because there is no other red Soul. Now the funniest thing: if someone manages to prove NarraChara theory, they also prove that Frisk is not a human because of nature of the human Soul and ENTRY #7.

More support: A human cannot absorb a human soul so Chara couldn't go into Frisk if Frisk already had a soul. And who said that Frisk must be a human? Yes, Frisk is called by monsters a human child, but how you or anyone will call a small humanoid if not a human, child or both? However, calling someone like that doesn't make them a human.

''More support: When you play through the power route (aka genocide) there is only Chara. It's like Frisk isn't there at all.'' According to NarraChara theory that you apparently believing in, Chara provides narration all the time regardless of chosen path, but it doesn't prove that Frisk doesn't exist. It just proves there was always Chara becaues Frisk is just mute or something. And what actually makes the Not Frisk so silent all the time? Chara isn't mute after all :]

''And more support: The exact wording on the prophecy is: "The Angel, who's seen the surface, will come back and the Underground will go empty." Note the 'come back' that applies to Chara but not a separate-entity-Frisk.'' ''The Angel... The One Who Has Seen The Surface... They will return. And the underground will go empty'' - ancient glyphs. It applies to everyone who has seen the Surface and is able to return to Underground and make it empty. And nothing more.