Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31981697-20170722123329/@comment-32182236-20171017111946

It's not that its "unrecognizable". It's the mushroom part of the logo.

Also, in your case of Chara's SOUL, that would be affirming the consequent. It may very well be just a portrait of a SOUL. This is more of a case of "all squares are rectangles but not all rectangles are squares."

If the game is Undertale, the logo must match Undertale. If the object is Chara's SOUL, then its sprite must match Chara's SOUL. But we can't just flip it around and say that if the sprite matches Chara's SOUL, it must be Chara's SOUL:That's affirming the consequent-It may very well simply be a portrait of a red SOUL, hence the similarities.

Also, proving things scientifically is how we got this far. Without it, we can just come up with whatever wacky theory we want. Sans is Ness even becomes valid! In fact, why not just go all-out and say that Frisk is Chara, despite the very clear evidence against it?