Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190617222636/@comment-32182236-20190808172605

Of course, you can't collab with someone who you don't even think exists.

Yeah, maybe I should get back to my Mother Analysis. I'm also waiting for your responses to my rebuttal of Chapter 8 and 9.. But I suppose you plan to wait until I finish Chapter 11 before responding to them? That's the only explanation I can think of for why you still haven't responded to them. Perhaps you have a point that I plan on taking down in the later chapters..

(I know you said Chapter 10, but as I said-I can't make Chapter 10 without first analyzing the Mother series, because of how heavily it relies of said series. And the Mother series isn't a series I've analyzed much on. Plus, I'm presenting this to an Undertale audience, on an Undertale wiki, so if I put Mother into my rebuttal, I've got to explain myself. Not everyone here knows the story of the Mother series.)

I don't dismiss details as mistakes. I say that if there's a contradiction, there's a mistake somewhere.

Like how Phone Guy's death is impossible when we see how the animatronics actually operate. After all, if Shadow Freddy broke the rules before.. Why not break them with Mike?

...But perhaps there is no contradiction after all. The sound actually matches the sound that plays in the "It's Me" hallucination. So perhaps the sound is just that-A hallucination.

...If it was, it wouldn't show up on the tape. And that's exactly what we hear.

So there's one contradiction solved. I think I'll have to go back and look for the other contradictions I found, and see if they're also contradictions, or are explainable. And perhaps you can help explain the apparent contradictions that made me lose interest in solving FNAF as well. And show that they're not contradictions after all. (If a story contains contradictions, I give up in trying to solve it, because a story with contradictions is a story with no solution.)

But before that.. I'll have to finish my rebuttal. I still plan on doing the simulation of your theory after I'm done with the Epilouge of your theory.. And even though the simulation will be the Epilouge of my rebuttal.. It won't be the end of the discussion.

As I said earlier, if there are inaccuracies.. "Glitches" in my simulations.. Point them out, and I'll run the simulation again with the new information.

In essence, the simulation will both be a rebuttal of your theory in its current state... And a challenge to you.

A challenge to make a hypothesis that doesn't crash the simulation.