Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20200214154305/@comment-26907577-20200215004352

You provided this example of a fallacious argument: Is it intentional that, besides using a false premise (and therefore being unsound), it makes a categorization error (assuming only humans do not kill)?
 * Premise 1:Humans don't kill (FALSE)
 * Premise 2:Frisk doesn't kill in Pacifist (TRUE)
 * Conlusion:Frisk is a human in Pacifist (Failed to prove:Therefore, indeterminate)

Additionally: Does that error have a name? It seems like affirming the consequent, but not quite.