Talk:Chara/@comment-35030974-20200103203535

Okay, I have one thing to say.

Chara's morality is only ambiguous in a Genocide context (and that includes Soulless Pacifist). Otherwise, there's no real reason to call them evil. You can say they're a bad person, but they aren't evil.

Chara and Frisk are the same, morally, and it all depends on what ending you think is Undertale's canon. If the True Pacifist route is really the canon ending of Undertale, then Chara is just fine, as is Frisk. If you think Genocide/Soulless Pacifist should be considered canon, then both Frisk and Chara have ambiguous moralities.

If you're trying to decide on the moralities of the two characters, take the evidence of the two timelines seperately, even if you want to decide on one overall moral stance. These characters change completely depending on which route you're on, which is what makes the debate of their moralities so confusing.

And please don't reply making any claims towards Frisk or Chara. Just.. take your debates somewhere else.