Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26484959-20160504032707/@comment-34368001-20200127203811

PersonThePerson wrote: Okay, I know we're agreeing to disagree, but...

The evidence that Myrmidon has for Chara being evil is demonstrably false??? So it's not really "up for interpretation."

Here, let me show you:

- Scripted cutscenes exist in pacifist and neutral routes, not just genocide.

- Chara also speaks in white text.

- Asriel is a boss monster, so Chara could just kill him and absorb his SOUL.

I mean, something like Gaster would be up for intepretation, and I'd be fine with opinions about him. Pretty much all backstory from any of the fallen humans is incredibly vague, with Chara being the person we know most about. An interpretation of the vague parts is fine! You can go ahead and say that Chara was secretly manipulating Asriel and never really cared about him OR that Chara loved Asriel and only lashed out at the humans to defend themselves! The problem is that Myrmidon's evidence is not from one of the vague parts - it's from parts of the game that are clear in what happened!

Anyways, I think I spent too many words on this. But that's my two cents. I quite frankly don't care if you think I'm wrong.