Thread:TheHumanAmbassador/@comment-30937172-20181013191124/@comment-32182236-20181014232258

..Yeah, that still won't do it.

...Anyways, about this whole Chara thing.. Apparently it's divided the fanbase, mostly into those saying Frisk corrupted Chara, and those saying that Chara just completely took over Frisk and Frisk is completely innocent. ..And denying one might make people think you're on the other side. ..As you might know, I'm on neither side. Chara's evil, Frisk is evil too. If the Chara defenders got one thing right, it's that Chara really DOESN'T start encouraging you to kill until you already started. (Actually, only-half right:Look at the special narration for the first Froggit). Thus, it's true that Frisk did Genocide of their own choice. (Though it could be because they see monsters as the villains. Though it should be obvious that Toriel is against the villainous Asgore's plans.. Frisk, why didn't you absorb her SOUL, by the way?)

...But that doesn't mean Chara was good at first, it's that they don't think someone who's so against killing would do so just because some random ghost child told them to.. Or that they want someone evil just like them. I mean, just as it's ridiculous to claim that Chara's presence somehow "corrupted" Frisk, it's ridiculous to claim that Frisk's presence somehow "corrupted" Chara. (Yes, they appear to be very similar arguments.)