Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26006155-20190425222457/@comment-26006155-20190614122033

Can you explain The Pink Guy Truther's Club, for me then?

Someone holds up two sprites that are clearly opposite in every physical detail, in front of the whole world, and says they're the same thing?

Is it speculative for me to say that they're different? Or is that literal, since they clearly are?

I found an amazing story by using the idea that they're different, that goes several layers down.

But when I try to show it to someone? They stop on layer 1. And refuse to go any further.

Because although he has twice the screen time as The Purple Guy in FNAF 2... The Pink Guy doesn't exist.

Is my frustration out of place?

Am I weak because I don't have the strength to move an Unmoveable Object?

Am I weak willed for thinking of quiting after trying to move an Unmoveable Object for years?

Is it wrong to me to point out, to someone who laughs at Flat Earthers and Climate Change Deniers, that his unwillingness to see the truth rivals their own?

Such a person would ask me to trash and renounce everything I found in The Color Brothers, as a prerequisite for any agreement. Despite the many times it predicted the future.

To simply erase my greatest breakthrough about FNAF right off the map.

And, by doing so, invalidate literally every other point I've made in any FNAF videos I've done after that time, buildilng on that base.

Which is the very reason the Pink Guy has been such a high priority target for years.

Am I wrong to not agree with this condition?