Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-32182236-20190716014521/@comment-32182236-20190720201434

I edited my previous post, because even more evidence was found. Here's a reworded version of it (plus updated to account for the evidence you brought up!)

The narrator gets wrong Frisk's actions with Snowdrake's Mother, and "Tears run down your face" is a proposition that we, the player, wouldn't make, as that wasn't a part of the "Laugh" option. So this narrator is neither the player nor Frisk. So to say the narrator is not Chara now requires making a THIRD narrator that we have no evidence of existing whatsoever. And as you point out, this third narrator would also need to know something that only Chara and Asriel would know. So that requires that we call the third narrator an omniscient one. (Or the one that calls Frisk "Frisk" is omniscient, bringing the narrator count down to 2.. But that means the non-omniscient narrator that gets what Frisk said wrong can't be Frisk or Chara.. So the "it's me, Chara" narrator must be someone we're not sure about, or there's a third narrator.. that we're not sure about. It's like Russel's teapot at this point.