Talk:Chara/@comment-33170295-20200107164313/@comment-33883848-20200115181812

@TheHumanAmbassador

@Jacky720

So your logic is :

1. Chara hated humanity but that alone doesn't mean they planned to kill them.

2. The evidence is that Chara carried their body to the village, which MUST be they tried to provoke an attack because they hated humanity.

This is a weak argument. You say that the fact Chara hates humanity isn't enough YET you use this exact fact to back up the idea that Chara carried the body to provoke an attack, it's pretty circular. If the fact that Chara hate humanity isn't enough, then don't rely on this fact to interpret other facts as your other arguments simply CAN'T work without this fact.

So far, nothing suggest that Chara brought their body to provoke an attack. After all, they ALREADY planned to kill 6 of them so they'll attack anyway. And there's proof that Chara REALLY liked the flowers from their village:

"It's a drawing of a golden flower" -neutral run narration

"My drawing" -genocide run

See? Chara liked to draw golden flowers, which indicates that they loved them so why is that far fetched to say that they just wanted to rest their body on those flowers similarly to Toriel when they died? Sure, it was likely also an excuse to get the surface but that doens't contradict my point: that chara specifically chose this location because it was the only place those flowers even grow.

But no matter what i say, you're pretty hell-bent on your interpretation and not even logical arguments can change your mind